2016
DOI: 10.22359/cswhi_7_3_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screen or not to screen? 7 questions in prevention of infection from refugees and migrants

Abstract: Introduction: The aim of this paper was to review the preventive strategies for screening of commonest infections in migrants. Germany, UK, France, Spain and Italy have highest numbers 25 mil migrants (31% of global migrant population) 70% from EE and North Africa 1.9 million per year illegally,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This principle can also be used to solve problems of cultural dialogue (Dupkala, Ayan, 2017). This issue is current, especially in connection with the various dangers associated with migrants from Islamic states (Khaled, Cauda, Benca, et al, 2016). On this question, we agree with the author Storoška: "Biblical basis is constitutive to our understanding of the nature of human dignity, the definition of which cannot be (in the European context) separated from the anthropological understanding that is derived from the image of human being as found in the book of Genesis" (Storoska, 2018:61).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This principle can also be used to solve problems of cultural dialogue (Dupkala, Ayan, 2017). This issue is current, especially in connection with the various dangers associated with migrants from Islamic states (Khaled, Cauda, Benca, et al, 2016). On this question, we agree with the author Storoška: "Biblical basis is constitutive to our understanding of the nature of human dignity, the definition of which cannot be (in the European context) separated from the anthropological understanding that is derived from the image of human being as found in the book of Genesis" (Storoska, 2018:61).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%