The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2000
DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screen-detected breast cancers have a lower mitotic activity index

Abstract: We know that screening for breast cancer leads to detection of smaller tumours with less lymph node metastases. Could it be possible that the decrease in mortality after screening is not only caused by this earlier stage, but also by a different mitotic activity index (MAI) of the tumours that are detected by screening? Is MAI a prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival? A retrospective study was carried out of 387 patients with breast cancer, treated at the University Hospital Nijmegen between January 19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program stated that breast cancer mortality rate declined by 2.3% each year between 1990 and 2003 after effective breast screening in USA (SEER, 2005). Breast cancers detected by screening mammography are smaller and have a more favorable prognosis compared to tumors detected outside the screening (Gilliland et al, 2000;Groenendijk et al, 2000;Joensuu et al, 2004). Therefore, screening mammography has been claimed as the most valuable tool for detection of early breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program stated that breast cancer mortality rate declined by 2.3% each year between 1990 and 2003 after effective breast screening in USA (SEER, 2005). Breast cancers detected by screening mammography are smaller and have a more favorable prognosis compared to tumors detected outside the screening (Gilliland et al, 2000;Groenendijk et al, 2000;Joensuu et al, 2004). Therefore, screening mammography has been claimed as the most valuable tool for detection of early breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screen-detected (SD) cancers are less likely to have axillary lymph node metastases, poor histological differentiation, high mitotic index, high S phase fraction, and low levels of hormone receptor expression [1][2][3][4]. Multivariate studies have associated SD cancers with a decreased risk of lymph node metastases even after adjustment for tumour size [1,3], histological grade, hormone receptor status, and DNA ploidy [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with cancers found by the patient herself, cancers detected in screening are usually smaller in size and are usually better differentiated and contain less tumor necrosis, have lower mitotic counts, express less frequently TP53 or HER2, have higher estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) contents, and are less frequently associated with regional lymph node metastases (4)(5)(6)(7)(8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%