2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2009.5414090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scratch detection supported by coherency analysis of motion vector fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [19], a multiple hypothesis tracker (MHT) is utilized for scratch tracking. Gulu et al [20] suggest a block-matching manner in motion compensated frames to distinguish scratches with a predefined threshold, and Muller et al [21] take into account precise movement information as well as a hierarchical block-matching algorithm optimized toward tracking vertical objects. These detection methods, though achieving better accuracy than spatial-only detectors, are likely to be confused by complicated real scratch paths along time axis, which pose difficulty and instability on tracking or block-matching mechanism, and the huge computational load has hampered their widespread use.…”
Section: A Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [19], a multiple hypothesis tracker (MHT) is utilized for scratch tracking. Gulu et al [20] suggest a block-matching manner in motion compensated frames to distinguish scratches with a predefined threshold, and Muller et al [21] take into account precise movement information as well as a hierarchical block-matching algorithm optimized toward tracking vertical objects. These detection methods, though achieving better accuracy than spatial-only detectors, are likely to be confused by complicated real scratch paths along time axis, which pose difficulty and instability on tracking or block-matching mechanism, and the huge computational load has hampered their widespread use.…”
Section: A Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figs. 2 and 3, we change the value of μ from 0.8 to 4 and plot the corresponding function curves of: true-positive rate R TP 1 (μ) in (18) [R TP 2 (μ) in (20)] and false-positive rate R FP 1 (μ) in (19) [R FP 2 (μ) in (21)] for the eight synthetic videos. We also set the R FP 1 (μ) ( R FP 2 (μ)) as a horizontal ordinate and the R TP 1 (μ) (R TP 2 (μ)) as a vertical ordinate to plot the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the decomposition performance of different μ.…”
Section: B Parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we avoid the difficult task of tracking true scratches, whose temporal behaviour is difficult to determine. In order to decide on the rejection of a detection, we also estimate a robust affine scene motion, in contrast to some previous methods [9], [19] which employ less robust motion estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Primary scratch with length equal to height of frame or 90% of frame height [2] • Secondary scratch of length less than the height of primary scratch. • The scratch width is usually less than 5 pixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%