2000
DOI: 10.1136/vr.146.14.391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scrapie surveillance in Great Britain: results of an abattoir survey, 1997/98

Abstract: A randomised sample of 2,809 apparently healthy sheep, 55 per cent of them less than 15 months of age, which were slaughtered for human consumption at abattoirs in Great Britain in 1997/98, was taken to establish the prevalence of scrapie infection. The medulla oblongata of each sheep was examined histopathologically at the level of the obex, and fresh brain tissue was examined for scrapie-associated fibrils (SAF) to establish whether there was evidence of scrapie. In addition, histological sections of the med… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This extends previous studies on scrapie prevalence in Europe which have either been limited to one region or country [36-39] or have not discriminated between CS and AS [40,41]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This extends previous studies on scrapie prevalence in Europe which have either been limited to one region or country [36-39] or have not discriminated between CS and AS [40,41]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The prevalence of infection in on October 14, 2014 rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Downloaded from (table 1) is also computed using equation (3.3), which assumes that the ages of the animals sampled are uniformly distributed within the age class. This is reasonable because animals were sampled throughout the year (Simmons et al 2000;cf. Webb et al 2001).…”
Section: (A) Prevalence Of Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scrapie surveillance data have been collected from multiple sources and over a number of years, most previous estimates of scrapie prevalence have been based on data collected during a single year, often utilizing only a single source of surveillance data [3][4][5][6][7][8]. However, there are problems associated with estimating prevalence from a single source of data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%