Scrape cytology and radiological solid size correlation can be used in the intraoperative management of subsolid lung nodules

Abstract

Background The term radiologic subsolid lung nodule (SLN) represents a heterogeneous group of non‐neoplastic and neoplastic lesions. Intraoperative evaluation (IO) is often required to differentiate and diagnose. The current study aims to investigate the feasibility and reliability of scrape cytology (SC) and radiologic solid size correlation for the IO diagnosis of SLNs. Methods Sixty‐eight patients with SLN signs were eligible to take part in the study due to intraoperatively prepared SC slides. We managed to complete the blind radiologic solid size measurement and cytologic evaluation retrospectively. Cases were grouped into three categories based on their cytological features: Group‐0 (Benign), Group‐1 (mild atypical features), and Group‐2 (severe atypical features/unequivocally carcinoma). IO diagnoses were given by combining the radiologic solid size and cytological findings. Results Cytological features of Group‐1 were observed in 100%, 93%, 32.5%, and 17% of the AIS, MIA, IA, and benign lesions, respectively. Cytological features of Group‐2 were observed in 67.5%, and 7% of the IA and MIA, respectively. By combining cytology with radiologic solid size, 100%, 85%, 71%, and 83% of the AIS, IA, MIA, and benign lesions respectively were diagnosed correctly. Fifteen (15%) percent of the IA cases were underdiagnosed as MIA since their radiological solid sizes were less than 0.5 cm with cytological features of Group‐1. Conversely, 29% of the MIA cases were overdiagnosed as IA since their radiological solid sizes were greater than 0.5 cm. Conclusion SLNs should be handled with caution in terms of IO management. SC and radiologic solid size correlation both provide a practical and tissue‐protecting approach for the IO evaluation of SLNs, ensuring a high consistency between IO and definitive diagnosis.