VA nursing home compare metrics as an indicator of skilled nursing facility quality for veterans

Abstract

Background The Veterans Administration (VA) provides several post‐acute care (PAC) options for Veterans, including VA‐owned nursing homes (called Community Living Centers, CLCs). In 2016, the VA released CLC Compare star ratings to support decision‐making. However, the relationship between CLC Compare star ratings and Veterans CLC post‐acute outcomes is unknown. Methods Retrospective observational study using national VA and Medicare data for Veterans discharged to a CLC for PAC. We used a multivariate regression model with hospital random effects to examine the association between CLC Compare overall star ratings and PAC outcomes while controlling for patient, facility, and hospital factors. Our sample included Veteran enrollees age 65+ who were community‐dwelling, experienced a hospitalization, and were discharged to a CLC in 2016–2017. PAC outcomes included 30‐day unplanned hospital readmission, 30‐day mortality, 100‐day successful community discharge, and a secondary composite outcome of unplanned readmission or death within 30‐days of the hospital discharge. Results Of the 25,107 CLC admissions, 4088 (16.3%) experienced an unplanned readmission, 4069 (16.2%) died within 30‐days of hospital discharge, and 12,093 (48.2%) had a successful 100‐day community discharge. Admission to a lower‐quality (1‐star) facility was associated with lower odds of successful community discharge (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.66, 0.91) and higher odds of a combined endpoint of 30‐day mortality and readmission (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.09, 1.49), compared to 5‐star facilities. However, outcomes were not consistently different between 5‐star and 2, 3, or 4‐star facilities. Star ratings were not associated with individual readmission or mortality outcomes when considered separately. Conclusion These findings suggest comparisons of 1‐star and 5‐star CLCs may provide meaningful information for Veterans making decisions about post‐acute care. Identifying ways to alter the star ratings so they are differentially associated with outcomes meaningful to Veterans at each level is essential. We found that 1‐star facilities had higher rates of 30‐day unplanned hospital readmission/death, and lower rates of 100‐day successful community discharges compared to 5‐star facilities. Yet, like past work on CMS Nursing Home Compare ratings, these relationships were found to be inconsistent or not meaningful across all star levels. CLC Compare may provide useful information for discharge and organizational planning, with some limitations.

Antihypertensive Medication and Fracture Risk in Older Veterans Health Administration Nursing Home Residents

“…For this analysis, the cohort was restricted from 2016 to coincide with the introduction of quality ratings for VA nursing homes. 25 Sixth, we assessed for the presence of effect modification among patients with dementia, systolic blood pressure (<140, ≥140 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (<80, ≥80 mm Hg), age (<80, ≥80 years), and baseline use of antihypertensive medication (0, >0). For all subgroup analyses, the PSs were re-estimated and the cohorts were rematched.…”

“…Fifth, we adjusted for the following 3 facility-level quality measures in the PS models: unannounced survey ratings, patient-to-staff ratings, and quality star ratings. For this analysis, the cohort was restricted from 2016 to coincide with the introduction of quality ratings for VA nursing homes . Sixth, we assessed for the presence of effect modification among patients with dementia, systolic blood pressure (<140, ≥140 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (<80, ≥80 mm Hg), age (<80, ≥80 years), and baseline use of antihypertensive medication (0, >0).…”