2023
DOI: 10.1002/pro.4841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TEPCAM: Prediction of T‐cell receptor–epitope binding specificity via interpretable deep learning

Junwei Chen,
Bowen Zhao,
Shenggeng Lin
et al.

Abstract: The recognition of T‐cell receptor (TCR) on the surface of T cell to specific epitope presented by the major histocompatibility complex is the key to trigger the immune response. Identifying the binding rules of TCR–epitope pair is crucial for developing immunotherapies, including neoantigen vaccine and drugs. Accurate prediction of TCR–epitope binding specificity via deep learning remains challenging, especially in test cases which are unseen in the training set. Here, we propose TEPCAM (TCR–EPitope identific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential of TCRs as therapeutics for cancer and other diseases has led to substantial research effort dedicated to understanding and predicting their pMHC interactions and specificity e.g. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Despite the importance of this task [20], TCR complementarity remains extremely difficult to predict beyond well-explored case studies, with existing computational models failing to generalise to unseen data [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The potential of TCRs as therapeutics for cancer and other diseases has led to substantial research effort dedicated to understanding and predicting their pMHC interactions and specificity e.g. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Despite the importance of this task [20], TCR complementarity remains extremely difficult to predict beyond well-explored case studies, with existing computational models failing to generalise to unseen data [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, most TCR:pMHC specificity predictors use sequence based features only [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The incorporation of structural information offers a compelling strategy to encourage models to learn more generalisable physicochemical principles of complementarity [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many machine learning and deep learning-based methods have been developed to predict the interaction between TCRs and epitopes. Deep learning-based methods use a wide variety of architectures, such as the convolutional neural networks (CNNs) (9)(10)(11)(12), long short-term memory (LSTM) (13), autoencoder (13), and attention mechanism (6,14,15). Some tools, such as TITAN (6), ImRex (12), pMTnet (16), epiTCR (17), and TEINet (18), consider only the information of the TCR beta chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%