2018
DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201707689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEMA 3C drives cancer growth by transactivating multiple receptor tyrosine kinases via Plexin B1

Abstract: Growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathway activation is a key mechanism for mediating cancer growth, survival, and treatment resistance. Cognate ligands play crucial roles in autocrine or paracrine stimulation of these RTK pathways. Here, we show SEMA3C drives activation of multiple RTKs including EGFR, ErbB2, and MET in a cognate ligand‐independent manner via Plexin B1. SEMA3C expression levels increase in castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), where it functions to promote cancer cell growth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
95
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(68 reference statements)
3
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that Sema domain is necessary for ligand docking and MET dimerization 16 , whereas the juxtamembrane domain regulates stability and nuclear trafficking of MET 25,26 , we postulated that the interaction with HER2 requires an intact Sema domain. On the basis that Sema-domain decoy proteins could suppress RTK activities 16,27 , we generated recombinant Sema proteins without the tyrosine kinase region-containing both the PSI domain and either WT (rSema wt ) or mutated (rSema N375S ) Sema sequences ( Supplementary Table 1)-as inhibitor proteins to competitively disrupt the interaction of MET with its binding partners. While both rSema proteins dose-dependently reduced the cell viability of MET wt-tGFP cells (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that Sema domain is necessary for ligand docking and MET dimerization 16 , whereas the juxtamembrane domain regulates stability and nuclear trafficking of MET 25,26 , we postulated that the interaction with HER2 requires an intact Sema domain. On the basis that Sema-domain decoy proteins could suppress RTK activities 16,27 , we generated recombinant Sema proteins without the tyrosine kinase region-containing both the PSI domain and either WT (rSema wt ) or mutated (rSema N375S ) Sema sequences ( Supplementary Table 1)-as inhibitor proteins to competitively disrupt the interaction of MET with its binding partners. While both rSema proteins dose-dependently reduced the cell viability of MET wt-tGFP cells (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that Sema proteins have been shown to act as oncogenic ligands in the activation of RTKs that include MET and HER2 27 . Based on molecular modeling and simulations, we postulate that the asparagine-to-serine substitution could induce significant localized conformational changes (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PlexinB1 and its ligand Sema3C have been shown to promote resistance to androgen receptor pathway inhibition in prostate cancer treatment. Inhibition of either PlexinB1 or Sema3C significantly delays regrowth of prostate cancer xenografts in mice following castration or enzalutamide treatment [10]. In addition, overexpression of Sema3C increases the regrowth of prostate cancer xenografts following castration [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibition of either PlexinB1 or Sema3C significantly delays regrowth of prostate cancer xenografts in mice following castration or enzalutamide treatment [10]. In addition, overexpression of Sema3C increases the regrowth of prostate cancer xenografts following castration [10]. In clinical prostate cancer, high Sema3C expression levels are associated with resistance to ADT in patient derived xenografts [39] and an increase in Sema3C is found in CRPC and bone metastases [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation