2013
DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schumpeter, Commons, and Veblen on Institutions

Abstract: This article compares Schumpeter, Veblen, and Commons with regard to institutions setting up the paradigm of institutional evolutionary economics. Their theories are of a complex nature, and as such, it is very difficult to situate them in a clear‐cut tradition. The main similarity is their opposition to the thesis that market economy is an independent and self‐regulating system, in an attempt to integrate economic, sociological, and political perspectives with regard to the functioning of the system. Also, ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Veblen new economic conditions lead to new ways of thinking and to new institutions through habituation. Habituation, being perhaps the "most important contribution" of Veblen in the field of social change, "occurs through the relentless incalculation of a habit of thought as man makes a living through a particular mode of production" and thus is "behavioristic in nature" (Dugger 1979, 428; see also Papageorgiou, Katselides, and Michaelides 2013;Papageorgiou and Michaelides 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Veblen new economic conditions lead to new ways of thinking and to new institutions through habituation. Habituation, being perhaps the "most important contribution" of Veblen in the field of social change, "occurs through the relentless incalculation of a habit of thought as man makes a living through a particular mode of production" and thus is "behavioristic in nature" (Dugger 1979, 428; see also Papageorgiou, Katselides, and Michaelides 2013;Papageorgiou and Michaelides 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peirce, James and Dewey) intellectual influences. In contrast to the mechanistic and static perception of classical and neoclassical economic tradition, institutional economists regarded the economic system as a dynamic and evolutionary process (Papageorgiou et al, 2013). Within such a system, the individual is considered a social being whose behaviour is affected by the force of habit and formed by the individual's interaction with the other members of the community.…”
Section: Origins and Methods Of The Old Institutional School Of Econo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of individual actors depends on the institutional and social contexts. Institutional change embodied in economic change takes place only when individuals overcome previously existing collective routines (Papageorgiou et al 2013(Papageorgiou et al , p. 1245.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no doubt that Joseph Alois Schumpeter, Thorstein Veblen and Pierre Bourdieu are among the most influential academics that have merged classical political economy with sociology and are considered as pioneers of institutional and evolutionary thinking (Bögenhold 2007, a, b, c). Unfortunately, so far, some aspects of their works remain less widely discussed, or even unexplored, and as a result, possible linkages such as theoretical and methodological parallels between their works remain inadequately acknowledged, with the exception of a number of contributions, such as O'Donnell (1973), Zingler (1974), Cramer and Leathers (1977), Ferrarotti (1999), Gurkan (2005), Papageorgiou et al (2013), Valiati and Fonseca (2014) and Papageorgiou and Michaelides (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%