2022
DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residence after retirement: A review and bibliometric analysis

Abstract: This study reviews the literature on the residence after retirement via Systematic Literature Network Analysis, which consists of the systematic literature review and bibliometric network analysis. There are three research questions, including (1) what the most recent studies are on the residence after retirement, (2) Who the most significant authors, documents, and sources are in residence after retirement, and (3) whether the extant research structure could guide the future agenda for the residence after ret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• In light of the studies reached as a result of comprehensive and detailed research and the data obtained from this study, bibliographic studies focused on elderly users have been very popular in the scientific area of architecture for the last three years globally (Cao et al, 2021;Ghamari et al, 2021;Hong et al, 2022;Li et al, 2022;Osei-Kyei et al, 2020;Wong et al, 2023). Especially between the years 2010 and 2022, the number of articles for elderly users increased rapidly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…• In light of the studies reached as a result of comprehensive and detailed research and the data obtained from this study, bibliographic studies focused on elderly users have been very popular in the scientific area of architecture for the last three years globally (Cao et al, 2021;Ghamari et al, 2021;Hong et al, 2022;Li et al, 2022;Osei-Kyei et al, 2020;Wong et al, 2023). Especially between the years 2010 and 2022, the number of articles for elderly users increased rapidly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%