2015
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced alphabet for protein folding prediction

Abstract: What are the key building blocks that would have been needed to construct complex protein folds? This is an important issue for understanding protein folding mechanism and guiding de novo protein design. Twenty naturally occurring amino acids and eight secondary structures consist of a 28-letter alphabet to determine folding kinetics and mechanism. Here we predict folding kinetic rates of proteins from many reduced alphabets. We find that a reduced alphabet of 10 letters achieves good correlation with folding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…后来, 又出现了诸多从蛋白质序列出发预测蛋白折叠速率 的 算 法和 软件 (或 网络 服务 ), 详 见文献 [65]. 最 近, 又出现了用精简的氨基酸和二级结构元件集来预测 蛋白折叠速率的方法, 结果表明, 折叠速率只与20种 氨基酸之中的8种、7种二级结构类型中的2种密切相 关 [66] . 上的准确率 [22] .…”
Section: 除此之外 还有哪些因素决定了蛋白的折叠速率? 解答这一问题的一个重要突破是1998年接触序参数unclassified
“…后来, 又出现了诸多从蛋白质序列出发预测蛋白折叠速率 的 算 法和 软件 (或 网络 服务 ), 详 见文献 [65]. 最 近, 又出现了用精简的氨基酸和二级结构元件集来预测 蛋白折叠速率的方法, 结果表明, 折叠速率只与20种 氨基酸之中的8种、7种二级结构类型中的2种密切相 关 [66] . 上的准确率 [22] .…”
Section: 除此之外 还有哪些因素决定了蛋白的折叠速率? 解答这一问题的一个重要突破是1998年接触序参数unclassified
“…To date, there are no tools that have the functionalities to group AAs based on their physicochemical or other properties and test the differential usage of AA groups. Historically, twenty naturally occurring AAs have been classified into two to 19 groups based on some measures of their relative similarity in physicochemical, structural, and functional properties; this has resulted in a variety of reduced (degenerate or simplified) alphabets [24][25][26][27]. With reduced alphabets, several AAs of a similar property are lumped together and represented by one letter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, twenty naturally occurring AAs has been classified into two to 19 groups based on some measures of their relative similarity in physicochemical, structural, and functional properties; this has resulted in a variety of reduced (degenerate or simplified) alphabets [24][25][26][27]. With reduced alphabets, several AAs of a similar property are lumped together and represented by one letter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%