2014
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P14.27: Ethics and ethical evaluation of a proposed clinical trial with maternal uterine artery vascular endothelial growth factor gene therapy to treat severe early‐onset fetal growth restriction in pregnant women

Abstract: Objectives:The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between placental thickness and pregnancy outcomes in the third trimester. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 5,386 singleton pregnancies presenting for routine ultrasonography at 32 weeks' gestation between January 2010 and December 2011. Each placenta was measured to a 1 mm precision, at its greatest thickness, which was perpendicular to the uterine wall. Thick placenta was determined as placenta that was above the 90th percen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consortium were awarded orphan drug status from the European Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products for FGR, the first time that a drug has been recognised for the treatment of FGR. In stakeholder and patient interviews conducted by the EVERREST consortium, maternal gene therapy was for the majority of stakeholders considered to be acceptable if there was clear fetal benefit (44). Most women felt they would be able to make informed decisions about taking part in such a trial whilst…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consortium were awarded orphan drug status from the European Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products for FGR, the first time that a drug has been recognised for the treatment of FGR. In stakeholder and patient interviews conducted by the EVERREST consortium, maternal gene therapy was for the majority of stakeholders considered to be acceptable if there was clear fetal benefit (44). Most women felt they would be able to make informed decisions about taking part in such a trial whilst…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%