2020
DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐Humeantheories of natural necessity

Abstract: Non-Humean theories of natural necessity invoke modallyladen primitives to explain why nature exhibits lawlike regularities. However, they vary in the primitives they posit and in their subsequent accounts of laws of nature and related phenomena (including natural properties, natural kinds, causation, counterfactuals, and the like). This article provides a taxonomy of non-Humean theories, discusses influential arguments for and against them, and describes some ways in which differences in goals and methods can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 See Carroll (2020), Hildebrand (2020) and Bhogal (2020) for more detailed surveys. My reason for focusing on these two is because they are two of the mostly science-friendly views in the literature, especially regarding the form of modern physical laws and the issue of the direction of time.…”
Section: Reformed Humeanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 See Carroll (2020), Hildebrand (2020) and Bhogal (2020) for more detailed surveys. My reason for focusing on these two is because they are two of the mostly science-friendly views in the literature, especially regarding the form of modern physical laws and the issue of the direction of time.…”
Section: Reformed Humeanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the claim that there are more chaotic Humean mosaics than regular ones the Humean could reasonably respond that this is no special problem for them—if anti‐Humean laws can be arbitrarily complicated then there are more chaotic anti‐Humean worlds than there are regular ones. (Although, whether this Humean response works may depend upon the exact version of anti‐Humeanism they are targeting, see Hildebrand (2013, 2020a, forthcoming)).…”
Section: The Case Against Humeanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Although not all anti‐Humean approaches think of laws as this separate, governing entity. See Hildebrand (2020a, forthcoming) for an excellent survey of anti‐Humean approaches).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the so-called DTA account, the term "second order" simply means that the necessitation relation concerns universals rather than particulars; it does not mean that this modal relation can be reduced to something else that is non-modal. Nevertheless, according to the advocates of the DTA theory, all universals are fundamental properties or relations, including the secondorder necessitation relation, and their nature is categorical and not dispositional.14 For the different versions of anti-Humean theories of laws, seeHildebrand (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%