MR and CT data with multiobserver delineations of organs in the pelvic area—Part of the Gold Atlas project

Abstract

Purpose: We describe a public dataset with MR and CT images of patients performed in the same position with both multiobserver and expert consensus delineations of relevant organs in the male pelvic region. The purpose was to provide means for training and validation of segmentation algorithms and methods to convert MR to CT like data, i.e., so called synthetic CT (sCT). Acquisition and validation methods: T1-and T2-weighted MR images as well as CT data were collected for 19 patients at three different departments. Five experts delineated nine organs for each patient based on the T2-weighted MR images. An automatic method was used to fuse the delineations. Starting from each fused delineation, a consensus delineation was agreed upon by the five experts for each organ and patient. Segmentation overlap between user delineations with respect to the consensus delineations was measured to describe the spread of the collected data. Finally, an open-source software was used to create deformation vector fields describing the relation between MR and CT images to further increase the usability of the dataset. Data format and usage notes: The dataset has been made publically available to be used for academic purposes, and can be accessed from https://zenodo.org/record/583096. Potential applications: The dataset provides a useful source for training and validation of segmentation algorithms as well as methods to convert MR to CT-like data (sCT). To give some examples: The T2-weighted MR images with their consensus delineations can directly be used as a template in an existing atlas-based segmentation engine; the expert delineations are useful to validate the performance of a segmentation algorithm as they provide a way to measure variability among users which can be compared with the result of an automatic segmentation; and the pairwise deformably registered MR and CT images can be a source for an atlas-based sCT algorithm or for validation of sCT algorithm.

Practical quantification of image registration accuracy following the AAPM TG‐132 report framework

“…There is a great need for a universally available, comprehensive library of digital datasets with the ground truth deformation data. A good example of a related recent project relying on public domain software and providing downloadable datasets would be the work by Nyholm et al Furthermore, it may not be realistic to expect a clinical physicist to perform validation of a DIR package for a full variety of clinical sites and use scenarios. A more practical approach may be for the software vendors to provide a comprehensive, objective set of characterization and validation data for their algorithms, from which at least an initial approximation of fitness for a particular task could be inferred.…”

Comparison of CBCT‐based dose calculation methods in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: from Hounsfield unit to density calibration curve to deep learning

“…[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] DLMs have been primarily proposed for pCT generation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). [26][27][28][29][30][31] They are particularly appealing owing to their fast computation time. One of the first DLMs for pCT generation was based on the U-Net architecture.…”

Comparative study of algorithms for synthetic CT generation from MRI: Consequences for MRI‐guided radiation planning in the pelvic region

“…The algorithms are commonly evaluated using different patient cohorts bearing different diseases and diverse image quality characteristics. A recent study (part of the Gold Atlas project ) reported on the development of a dedicated MR‐CT dataset with multi‐observer delineations of organs designed for the assessment of synthetic CT generation in the pelvic region . Comparison of different methods using the same cohorts, RT planning settings and evaluation standards gives valuable insight into robustness, potential applicability and expected quantitation errors in a clinical setting.…”