1981
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.540020412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MNDO calculations for compounds containing aluminum and boron

Abstract: Parametrization of MNDO for aluminum and comparisons of calculated molecular properties with experimental values indicate the general usefulness of MNDO to study aluminum-containing compounds. Although results are not as good as for molecules containing only C , H, N, and 0, they are nevertheless accurate enough to be useful, especially when predictive biases noted in this article are considered. Inclusion of the d orbital in the MNDO scheme may improve the aluminum results. Results for boron-containing molecu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For low level calculation using semiempirical methods [27] AM1 [28,29], PM3 [30], and PM6 [31], molecular mechanical methods UFF [32] (UFF uses charges calculated by the method of charge equilibration [33]), and Dreiding [34], the Gaussian 09 program [25] was used while for the MM+ method [35] the Hyperchem program [36] and for the MM3 the Tinker Program [22] were used instead.…”
Section: Journal Of Theoretical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For low level calculation using semiempirical methods [27] AM1 [28,29], PM3 [30], and PM6 [31], molecular mechanical methods UFF [32] (UFF uses charges calculated by the method of charge equilibration [33]), and Dreiding [34], the Gaussian 09 program [25] was used while for the MM+ method [35] the Hyperchem program [36] and for the MM3 the Tinker Program [22] were used instead.…”
Section: Journal Of Theoretical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The IP(E R ) was calculated as the difference between the total energies of the optimized neutral and ionic E R molecules. These calculations were performed by the modified neglecting differential overlap (MNDO) semiempirical method, 8 with a set convergence fixed at 0.04 KJ/mol. The geometry optimization was computed using the Polak-Ribierre (conjugated gradient) algorithm in which the convergence threshold was 0.04 KJ/ mol.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the different stable conformations obtained for each isomer (see Fig. 1), three potential energy surfaces obtained through the independent rotation of dihedral angles ω 1 (C6′‐C1′‐C2‐O), ω 2 (O‐C11*‐C8‐C8a), and ω 3 (O‐C2‐C1‐C6′) were calculated in vacuo with a semiempirical calculation using the AM1 Hamiltonian 32–34 as implemented in the Gaussian 03 package 35. All minima for each dihedral were combined together to generate tentative whole‐molecule minima.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%