2015
DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICSH guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of nonimmune hereditary red cell membrane disorders

Abstract: Specialist tests provide additional evidence in supporting the diagnosis and that will facilitate the management of the patient. In the case of a patient's clinical phenotype being more severe than the affected members within the immediate family, molecular testing of all family members is useful for confirming the diagnosis and allows an insight into the molecular basis of the abnormality such as a recessive mode of inheritance or a de novo mutation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
141
1
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
1
141
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The median age of diagnosis in this series is 16 years, probably because CDAII is often misdiagnosed with other congenital anaemias, particularly hereditary spherocytosis (King et al, 2015). However, when the analysis is performed as a function of the patients' date of birth, the age of diagnosis drastically drops to 1Á6 years (range 0-8) for subjects born in the last two decades, presumably due to the availability of sensitive and specific laboratory markers (hypoglycosylation of band 3 and presence of endoplasmic reticulum remnants in plasma membrane) (Alloisio et al, 1996), and the identification of the causative gene (Bianchi et al, 2009;Schwarz et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The median age of diagnosis in this series is 16 years, probably because CDAII is often misdiagnosed with other congenital anaemias, particularly hereditary spherocytosis (King et al, 2015). However, when the analysis is performed as a function of the patients' date of birth, the age of diagnosis drastically drops to 1Á6 years (range 0-8) for subjects born in the last two decades, presumably due to the availability of sensitive and specific laboratory markers (hypoglycosylation of band 3 and presence of endoplasmic reticulum remnants in plasma membrane) (Alloisio et al, 1996), and the identification of the causative gene (Bianchi et al, 2009;Schwarz et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The osmotic fragility test has been considered the gold standard screening test for HS but provides false-negative findings in about 25% of patients [24]. Eosin-5'-maleimide measurement and SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of erythrocyte membrane proteins are also useful for screening HS, but standardization of these methods is currently lacking [2526]. None of the HS screening tests can detect all patients because the clinical phenotypes are widely variable, ranging from asymptomatic to severely affected [27].…”
Section: Rbc Membranopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGS panels consisting of common disease-causing genes have been developed and applied to routine molecular diagnosis for undiagnosed IHA patients and their families [1599]. In particular, patients with the co-presence of membranopathy, enzymopathy, and/or hemoglobinopathy [25100] can be effectively diagnosed using this new technology. Causal gene identification can be deduced through an efficient and reliable strategy to impute and analyze NGS data [101] (Fig.…”
Section: Next-generation Sequencing For the Genetic Diagnosis Of Ihamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…170 Due to the concerted efforts of several EU groups, a new edition of diagnostic guidelines for hereditary spherocytosis is about to be published. 171 However, no specific guidelines are currently available for the rarer HAs.…”
Section: European Research Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%