<scp>Hysterosalpingo‐Foam</scp> Sonography for the Diagnosis of Tubal Occlusion

Melcer, Yaakov; Sharon, Nataly Zilberman; Nimrodi, Maya; Pekar-Zlotin, Marina; Gat, Itai; Maymon, Ron

doi:10.1002/jum.15607

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our findings are in consonance with previous publications, such as the study by Piccioni et al where HyFoSy showed a high concordance (>94.4%) compared to HyCoSy with saline solution (57.8%) when both techniques were confronted with LC ( 9 ). These data have been confirmed in the meta-analysis by Melcer et al in which 6 studies were included ( 8 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Sequential-contingent strategy for fallopian tube evaluation using hysterosalpingo foam sonography: a cost analysis

Armijo-Sánchez,

Santamaría-López,

Fernández-Sánchez

et al. 2024

Quant Imaging Med Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Tubal pathology is the etiological factor in 20% of couples with female infertility. Historically, diagnostic evaluation of the fallopian tubes has been performed by means of hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM ® foam is a recent technique with supposedly comparable effectiveness to HSG, but with better tolerability for patients. Methods Tubal patency was assessed in patients who were candidates for intrauterine insemination (IUI) between January 2020 and July 2021. (I) Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM ® foam. (II) If the patient had both tubes patent, IUI was proposed. In case of inconclusive or pathological results, HSG was performed. (III) If the HSG concludes tubal patency, IUI is proposed. On the other hand, if it results in tubal obstruction, in vitro fertilization (IVF) is proposed. Results Assessment of tubal patency by HSG showed concordance with previous Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM ® foam results in 45.5% (n=15) of cases of unilateral obstruction and 66.7% (n=6) of cases of bilateral obstruction. When we compare the total cost of HSG (€54,899.46) with the sum of patients who only required Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM ® foam together with those who underwent both tests (€45,575.96), it shows that the latter represents a cost benefit strategy (cost difference €9,323.50). Conclusions Our results suggest a benefit of €9,323.50 when performing the contingent sequential strategy, in case of pathological or inconclusive results, compared to performing a systematic HSG in all patients. Patients with an obstructive hysterosalpingogram with EXEM ® and a patent hysterosalpingogram will be the subgroup that will benefit the most, as IUI can be proposed instead of IVF. In addition, there is a benefit in terms of optimizing the medical procedure, hospital visits and speeding up the time to start assisted reproductive technology (ART).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%