Faculty of Radiation Oncology 2014 workforce census

Abstract

IntroductionThis paper reports the key findings of the Faculty of Radiation Oncology 2014 workforce census and compares the results with earlier surveys.MethodsThe census was conducted in mid‐2014 with distribution to all radiation oncologists, educational affiliates and trainees listed on the college database. There were six email reminders and responses were anonymous. The overall response rate was 76.1%.ResultsThe age range of fellows was 32–96 (mean = 49 years, median = 47 years). The majority of the radiation oncologists were male (n = 263, 63%). The minority of radiation oncologists were of Asian descent (n = 43, 13.4%). Radiation oncologists graduated from medical school on average 23 years ago (median = 22 years). A minority of fellows (n = 66, 20%) held another postgraduate qualification. Most radiation oncologists worked, on average, at two practices (median = 2, range 1–7). Practising radiation oncologists worked predominantly in the public sector (n = 131, 49%), but many worked in both the public and private sectors (n = 94, 37%), and a minority worked in the private sector only (n = 38, 14%). The largest proportion of the workforce was from New South Wales accounting for 29% of radiation oncologists. Radiation oncologists worked an average of 43 h/week (median = 43 h, range 6–80). Radiation oncologists who worked in the private sector worked less hours than their public sector or public/private sector colleagues. (38.3 vs. 42.9 vs. 44.3 h, P = 0.042). Victorians worked the fewest average hours per week at 38 h and West Australians the most at 46 h/week. Radiation oncologists averaged 48 min for each new case, 17 min per follow up and 11 min for a treatment review. Radiation oncologists averaged 246 new patients per year (median = 250, range = 20–600) with men (average = 268), Western Australians (average = 354) and those in private practice seeing more (average = 275). Most radiation oncologists considered themselves as specialists (n = 151, 60%), but nearly all those from South Australia were generalists (n = 15, 94%) as were three‐quarters of those from private practice. A minority of radiation oncologist respondents (10%) intended to retire within 5 years with a further 16% within 10 years.There was a stabilisation of trainee numbers in Australia and New Zealand with no increase compared with 2010 (142 in 2014 vs. 143 in 2010). The most common age bracket for trainees remained 31–35 years. One‐third of trainees were of Asian descent and nearly half held other degrees. The majority of trainees were satisfied with their career, but 30% were not entirely satisfied. Nearly half of trainee respondents would have reconsidered their choice of specialty had they known about the possible oversupply in the workforce with 12.4% undecided about continuing their career in radiation oncology. There were still 16% of trainees with no protected time during the working week, and a further 21% with only 1 h. Only one trainee respondent preferred to work in private practice, and job availability remained a c...

Domestic Job Shortage or Job Maldistribution? A Geographic Analysis of the Current Radiation Oncology Job Market

“…This problem is not unique to US radiation oncology graduates; for example, delayed workforce entry for Australian (15) and Canadian (16) trainees has resulted in extended resident training via single or multiple fellowships and even increased emigration. At this time, however, it is unclear whether the current labor concerns of recent US radiation oncology graduates are because of graduating trainees’ personal preferences, a geographic maldistribution, or an actual lack of employment opportunities.…”

Employment for radiation oncologists in Australia and New Zealand: Recent graduates survey of experiences and perspectives

“…This is the first study analysing recent radiation oncology graduates in relation to their employment experiences after completion of training. It was initiated partly as a response to a perception in the radiation oncology community of an oversupply of radiation oncologists in the ANZ workforce . Interestingly, half of Australian trainees say they would have reconsidered their choice of specialty had they known about possible oversupply in the workforce .…”

“…The College has been conducting a workforce analysis now for many years with the analysis based on current, optimal and an in between utilisation rate. The projected demand and supply reports actually forecast a shortage of ROs if the optimal initialization rate is achieved . We are also aware of the high reliance New Zealand continues to have on ROs trained overseas and of concern about undersupply of workforce there based on current utilisation.…”

“…In the past, securing a specialist job was seen as a natural progression of training and may have been relatively seamless. However, in the last decade, there has been a steady and large increase in trainee numbers In Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) peaking at 159 in 2011 . This increase in trainee numbers has created apprehension about job prospects post training.…”

“…However, there is no ‘hard’ evidence to confirm whether trainees struggle to secure employment post training. In fact, the ‘evidence’ is either anecdotal or reflects apprehension amongst the radiation oncology community . Hence, an analysis of all recent graduates might provide some crucial information in this regard.…”