2020
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.23753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data‐driven nonlinear chemical process fault diagnosis based on hierarchical representation learning

Abstract: Representation extraction is crucial in data‐driven process monitoring, and deep neural network (DNN) is an efficient tool for extracting representations from considerable process data. This study proposes a hierarchical representation learning (HRL) method that integrates the deep belief neural (DBN) network and support vector data description (SVDD) for efficient nonlinear chemical process fault diagnosis. First, hierarchical representations containing meaningful process information are generated through a D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15] A hierarchical representation learning (HRL) method that integrates the DBN and support vector data description (SVDD) was proposed for chemical process fault diagnosis. [16] SAE is currently the most widely used feature learning method and has been successfully applied in the multivariate industrial process monitoring. [17][18][19] The recursive stacked denoising autoencoder (RSDAE) was proposed for the dynamic relationship problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] A hierarchical representation learning (HRL) method that integrates the DBN and support vector data description (SVDD) was proposed for chemical process fault diagnosis. [16] SAE is currently the most widely used feature learning method and has been successfully applied in the multivariate industrial process monitoring. [17][18][19] The recursive stacked denoising autoencoder (RSDAE) was proposed for the dynamic relationship problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,4] The data-based fault diagnosis method does not need to establish a complex mechanism model; it only utilizes the relevant or causal latent features among data to match the difference between normal and fault. [5,6] Due to the convenience of its implementation, it has occupied a dominant position in recent studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the premise of the sufficient data, it has a good fault identification effect and feature extraction ability for highly nonlinear processes [17]. Therefore, multiple and multivariate statistical methods are combined to identify fault types; for example, the convolutional neural network (CNN) [18,19], dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) [20,21], long short term memory (LSTM) [22,23], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%