2020
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID ‐19 safety: aerosol‐generating procedures and cardiothoracic surgery and anaesthesia — Australian and New Zealand consensus statement

Abstract: Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 ( COVID ‐19) is a contagious disease that is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ( SARS ‐CoV‐2). Health care workers are at risk of infection from aerosolisation of respiratory secretions, droplet and contact spread. There are a number of procedures that represent a high risk of aerosol generation during cardiothoracic surgery. It is important that adequate training, equipment and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
40
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Stringent cleaning measures should be performed at regular intervals in all diagnostic rooms. [ 7 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] Some suggest nasal swab screening of asymptomatic medical personnel at regular intervals to minimize the risk of a possible nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 by asymptomatic hospital personnel. [ 41 ].…”
Section: Preoperative Strategies For Cardiac Surgery Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Stringent cleaning measures should be performed at regular intervals in all diagnostic rooms. [ 7 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] Some suggest nasal swab screening of asymptomatic medical personnel at regular intervals to minimize the risk of a possible nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 by asymptomatic hospital personnel. [ 41 ].…”
Section: Preoperative Strategies For Cardiac Surgery Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All efforts should be made to postpone the surgery during an active COVID-19 infection, for as long as is tolerated by the patient. [ 7 , 19 , 22 , 24 , 48 , 51 , 52 ] When to operate should be a decision shared by the surgeon, the cardiologist, the intensivist and the anesthesiologist, and the treatment of COVID-19 patients should be interdisciplinary. [ 53 ] While it remains unclear why COVID-19 patients undergoing cardiac surgery have significantly elevated mortality, one explanation could be the additive effect of cytokine release during surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass, possibly resulting in an overwhelming cytokine storm, as well as the pulmonary involvement with resulting acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.…”
Section: Preoperative Strategies For Cardiac Surgery Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is conflicting advice among societies regarding the use of bronchoscopy in this context. Regarding DLT placement, some societies advocate clinical confirmation of DLT position suggesting that bronchoscopy should be reserved for encountering difficulty or troubleshooting tube misplacement [ 27 , 28 ], whereas the majority still advocates the use of bronchoscopy in all patients [ 25 •, 26 •, 29 , 31 , 36 ], as it is the most reliable method of device placement. Guidelines concur that it should only be performed; during gas flow cessation, patient apnoea, without positive pressure in the circuit, and the adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valve set at zero cmH 2 O.…”
Section: Airway Device Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MJA has engaged in the debate about how to protect health care workers from infection, 10 a devastating outcome of the pandemic that was largely preventable. MJA authors have jumped into the often heated debates about schools and virus transmission, 11 the value of face masks, 12 the positive and negative effects of various public health measures, 10,13 lessons learned in an early nursing home outbreak, 14 the urgency of ensuring sufficient numbers of intensive care beds, 15 professional guidelines, 16,17 and protecting Indigenous Australians, 18 to name a few of the areas touched upon in our Journal. As, despite evidence and expert agreement, aberrant beliefs continued to circulate widely on social media, often causing alarm, the MJA has provided a source of reputable peer‐reviewed evidence, with expert syntheses of what is known and what has changed, published as rapidly as is responsible 19…”
Section: Our Response To the Covid‐19 Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%