Computed tomography scan accuracy for the prediction of lobe and division of liver tumors by four board‐certified radiologists

Abstract

Objective(1) Evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) scans for localization of liver masses. (2) Assess the agreement between radiologists on localization. (3) Determine if location influences the accuracy of localization and histopathologic diagnosis. (4) Determine what lobar vasculature radiologists found most useful for localization.Study designRetrospective.AnimalsA total of 67 client‐owned dogs with a total of 75 hepatic masses.MethodsRecords were reviewed for relevant data. Localization for each hepatic mass was performed by four radiologists (JH, EH, ML, JF) independently.ResultsOverall accuracy of mass localization was 217/292 (74.3%) by lobe and 264/300 (88%) by division. Accuracy for the quadrate lobe (11/27, 40.7%) was lower (p < .05) than for the caudate process of the caudate lobe (19/24, 79.2%), left medial lobe (47/64, 73.4%) and left lateral lobe (95/101, 89.6%). Accuracy for the right lateral lobe (17/35, 48.6%) was lower (p < .05) lower than for the left lateral lobe (95/101, 89.6%). Accuracy of localization was 173/192 (90.1%) for masses located in the left division, 37/48 (77.1%) in the central division, and 53/60 (88.3%) for the right division. The agreement (kappa) between radiologists was good (0.61–0.8) to excellent (0.81–1) for division and moderate (0.41–0.6) to good for lobe localization.ConclusionCT localization was more accurate for division than lobe localization of canine hepatic masses. Similarly, radiologists had a better agreement for division than lobe localization.Clinical significanceThis study supports CT as a useful modality for liver mass localization based on division. CT localization to specific lobes should be interpreted with some caution.