Cell Culture Engineering 2019
DOI: 10.1002/9783527811410.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CHOCell Engineering for Improved Process Performance and Product Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 235 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noncoding RNA‐mediated gene silencing 3. Gene KOs (Fischer et al, 2015; Fischer & Otte, 2019). Each of these approaches could target glycosylation genes (Malphettes et al, 2010; Ngantung et al, 2006; Son et al, 2011), cellular metabolism (Chong et al, 2010; Doolan et al, 2010; Jeong et al, 2001; Kim & Lee, 2007; Tabuchi et al, 2010; Zhou et al, 2011), antiapoptotic/proapoptotic pathways (Jeong et al, 2008; J. S. Lee et al, 2013; Wong et al, 2006), cellular productivity (Chung et al, 2004; Jadhav et al, 2012; Romand et al, 2016), cell cycle checkpoint kinases (K. H. Lee et al, 2013), PTMs (Škulj et al, 2014), and so forth.…”
Section: Crispr‐cas9‐mediated Gene Ko For Cell Line Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noncoding RNA‐mediated gene silencing 3. Gene KOs (Fischer et al, 2015; Fischer & Otte, 2019). Each of these approaches could target glycosylation genes (Malphettes et al, 2010; Ngantung et al, 2006; Son et al, 2011), cellular metabolism (Chong et al, 2010; Doolan et al, 2010; Jeong et al, 2001; Kim & Lee, 2007; Tabuchi et al, 2010; Zhou et al, 2011), antiapoptotic/proapoptotic pathways (Jeong et al, 2008; J. S. Lee et al, 2013; Wong et al, 2006), cellular productivity (Chung et al, 2004; Jadhav et al, 2012; Romand et al, 2016), cell cycle checkpoint kinases (K. H. Lee et al, 2013), PTMs (Škulj et al, 2014), and so forth.…”
Section: Crispr‐cas9‐mediated Gene Ko For Cell Line Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), the largest group of Food and Drug Administration‐approved biopharmaceuticals are most commonly produced in CHO cells (Lagassé et al, 2017; Walsh, 2006). Given the high value of these biopharmaceuticals, considerable attention is being paid to methods for accelerating cell line engineering and improving product yields and quality (Fischer & Otte, 2019; Lee et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the convenience and simplicity of gene editing have led to the development of multiplex knockouts of disadvantageous genes (Kol et al, 2020). In this way, the CRISPR tool has been used to improve various parameters of CHO cell bioprocessing, such as viability, protein folding, and secretion (Fischer & Otte, 2019; Hansen et al, 2017; Schweickert & Cheng, 2020; Shin et al, 2021). It has also facilitated the control and manipulation of protein glycosylation as well as the elimination of interfering host cell proteins (HCPs) (Amann et al, 2019; Kol et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Over the past decade, CHO cell productivity has increased from less than one milligram per liter to grams per liter [4] through process engineering, [5,6] media supplementation, [7,8] and cell line engineering. [9,10] Still, novel targets to engineer CHO cells are desired to increase yield per batch and to provide robust product quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%