BaYaka forager food sharing networks in the Congo Basin: The roles of gender homophily and kin sharing

Abstract

Objectives Food sharing is a costly form of cooperation that was likely critical to human evolutionary success, including the emergence of human's life history strategy. Food sharing in human communities may be maintained through a number of pathways, including direct dyadic reciprocity, reputation‐based processes, and kin‐biased exchange. Differences in reproductive demands, labor, and cultural norms may also result in gendered differences in cooperative networks. Here, we examine cooperative networks in egalitarian BaYaka foragers from the Congo Basin. Materials and Methods We collected social network data from 112 adults in 41 households in this subsistence community. We implement a Bayesian latent network model to assess individual‐, dyadic‐, and block‐level predictors of food sharing partners. Results Conditioning on covariates, we found limited evidence for direct dyadic reciprocity in food sharing. Despite local norms regarding prestige avoidance, we found status‐based homophily. High‐status individuals—council members and local healers—were more likely to share with one another. Importantly, our results highlight gender differences in patterns of food sharing, interacting with genetic relatedness. Women were more likely to share with one another, especially with kin as genetic relatedness increased. Discussion Our results align with evolutionary framing emphasizing kin selection in costly cooperation. The results showing that women cooperate with other women, particularly kin, also complement sex‐based patterns in some other mammalian species, potentially reflecting the social support necessary to manage reproductive costs and childcare. BaYaka women's subsistence productivity and local cultural dynamics for autonomy and egalitarianism may likewise help facilitate women's preferential cooperation with one another.

The interdependence of relational and material wealth inequality in Pemba, Zanzibar

“…In a context of high marital instability, where divorced women must depend on their natal lineage for support, such strategic reckoning allows for tensions between matrikin, patrikin and in-laws to be resolved, as Goldman [81] proposes. Taken together, the importance of gender for patterning relational wealth in present study contributes to an emerging literature on gender differences (and similarities) in cooperation in rural communities [95,96] (c) The linkage between relational wealth and material wealth…”

Camera traps unveil demography, social structure, and home range of six unhabituated Western chimpanzee groups in the Moyen Bafing National Park, Guinea

“…Accordingly, we were able to estimate whether the probability of observing associations was higher between adults of the same or different sexes (see Redhead, McElreath et al, 2023; Ross et al, 2023, for detailed technical outlines). To aid in interpretation of the results, we computed the contrast coefficient ∆ and highest posterior density intervals ( HPDI ) from the posterior distribution of the age/sex parameters included in our stochastic blockmodel (reflecting how such models have been interpreted in previous research, e.g., Gettler et al, 2023, Redhead, Ragione et al, 2023). ∆ represents the estimated change in the probability of observing associations between individuals of a given age/sex category (e.g., between female adults and male adults) in comparison to the probability of observed association between adult males (i.e., the reference group).…”

Gender disparities in material and educational resources differ by kinship system

“…Importantly, although there is significant evidence supporting predictions drawn from sexual selection theory across human societies [28–30], socio-ecological environments and institutions have important effects on expressed differences between men and women [31–33]. For example, our research group has found gender ‘reversals’ in health outcomes, where measures of matrilineal women's health were better than men's [31].…”