Encyclopedia of Biostatistics 2005
DOI: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a11006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Survival Analysis

Abstract: Great strides in the analysis of survival data using Bayesian methods have been made in the past ten years due to advances in Bayesian computation and the feasibility of such methods. In this chapter, we review Bayesian advances in survival analysis and discuss the various semiparametric modeling techniques that are now commonly used. We review parametric and semiparametric approaches to Bayesian survival analysis, with a focus on proportional hazards models. Reference to other types of models are also given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the model for the survival records, we model the intensity increment over a small time period, I i (s)ds, as the product of the integrated baseline hazard function, dΛ o (s), and whether record i is in the risk set, Y i (s), during that time period, [s, s + ds): I i (s)ds = Y i (s) 9 dΛ 0 (s). We assume constant integrated baseline hazards within each [s, s + ds) to have a proportional hazards form (Ibrahim et al 2005). To compare alternative models for density dependence in the survival process, we give I i (s)ds some functional form for the relationship between the intensity increment and the standardized log (l tÀ1 ).…”
Section: Process Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model for the survival records, we model the intensity increment over a small time period, I i (s)ds, as the product of the integrated baseline hazard function, dΛ o (s), and whether record i is in the risk set, Y i (s), during that time period, [s, s + ds): I i (s)ds = Y i (s) 9 dΛ 0 (s). We assume constant integrated baseline hazards within each [s, s + ds) to have a proportional hazards form (Ibrahim et al 2005). To compare alternative models for density dependence in the survival process, we give I i (s)ds some functional form for the relationship between the intensity increment and the standardized log (l tÀ1 ).…”
Section: Process Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frequently used term "survival analysis" (derived from applications in medical science) is used in the text instead of "duration analysis", "transition analysis" or "event history analysis" more common in economics and social science, respectively. Nonparametric and semiparametric statistical methods of survival analysis (Turnbull's estimate and an AFT regression model, respectively) are employed here, Bayesian models (Ibrahim, 2005) being, however, also well applicable in this case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fit 5, 7, and 9 basis functions. For each Monte Carlo iteration we selected the fit that had the best (highest) log pseudo marginal likelihood (Ibrahim, Chen, and Sinh, ) across number of basis functions.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%