2018
DOI: 10.1111/vcp.12583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASVCP guidelines: Allowable total error hematology

Abstract: The purpose of this document is to provide total allowable error (TE ) recommendations for commonly analyzed hematology measurands for veterinary personnel. These guidelines define relevant terminology and highlight considerations specific to hematology measurands. They also provide reasons and guidelines for using TE in instrument performance evaluation, including recommendations for when the total observed error exceeds the recommended TE . Biological variation-based quality specifications are briefly discus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
108
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QCM-based analysis did not allow for the evaluation of HCT or HGB TE obs (since the QCM does not contain RBCs), although the ASVCP TE a guidelines for these measurands are available. 9 Calculation of TE obs for HCT and HGB was based on camelid venous blood data (CV from camelid blood repeatability data and %bias from the method comparison data) and resulted in large TE obs values that likely overestimate the EPOC error. Omitting bias from the TEobs calculation and basing TE obs on CV alone yielded predictably much smaller TE obs results; these did meet TEa recommendations from ASVCP (10% for HCT and 10% for HGB).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…QCM-based analysis did not allow for the evaluation of HCT or HGB TE obs (since the QCM does not contain RBCs), although the ASVCP TE a guidelines for these measurands are available. 9 Calculation of TE obs for HCT and HGB was based on camelid venous blood data (CV from camelid blood repeatability data and %bias from the method comparison data) and resulted in large TE obs values that likely overestimate the EPOC error. Omitting bias from the TEobs calculation and basing TE obs on CV alone yielded predictably much smaller TE obs results; these did meet TEa recommendations from ASVCP (10% for HCT and 10% for HGB).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omitting bias from the TEobs calculation and basing TE obs on CV alone yielded predictably much smaller TE obs results; these did meet TEa recommendations from ASVCP (10% for HCT and 10% for HGB). 9 Incidental puncture of the carotid artery has been described as a common occurrence when attempting jugular venipuncture in alpacas and llamas, largely because of their relative lack of neck musculature and the absence of a well-defined jugular groove. 24 results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of TE a as a basis for comparability of results has been previously published by Camus et al, in which an acceptance criterion could be that a sample result is within ± TE a of the reference method result for that sample . The acceptable TE a ranges for the RBC values were based on the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) guidelines for hematology measurands, which recommend a TE a of 10% for HCT/PCV, RBC, and MCHC, and 7% for MCV …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the 3 measurements of each horse were calculated to determine the individual horse CV, dividing the SD by the mean. 7,14 Overall CV was calculated by averaging the individual CVs.…”
Section: Research-article2019mentioning
confidence: 99%