2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scores to Predict Major Bleeding Risk During Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: A Prospective Validation Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
69
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The first study evaluating the HAS-BLED score in VTE patients was performed in 663 elderly patients, and reported a poor c-statistic of 0.55 [52]. A second study, performed in 515 patients with various indications for the use of VKAs, reported a c-statistic of 0.57 for the HAS-BLED score for the entire population of VKA-users, without reporting the area under the curve for the VTE population separately [43]. In the third study, the HAS-BLED score was calculated in 223 patients with PE and 314 patients with DVT, who were treated with VKAs for a period of 6 months.…”
Section: Bleeding-prediction Scores Derived From Non-vte Patient Popumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first study evaluating the HAS-BLED score in VTE patients was performed in 663 elderly patients, and reported a poor c-statistic of 0.55 [52]. A second study, performed in 515 patients with various indications for the use of VKAs, reported a c-statistic of 0.57 for the HAS-BLED score for the entire population of VKA-users, without reporting the area under the curve for the VTE population separately [43]. In the third study, the HAS-BLED score was calculated in 223 patients with PE and 314 patients with DVT, who were treated with VKAs for a period of 6 months.…”
Section: Bleeding-prediction Scores Derived From Non-vte Patient Popumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 However, probably, for a number of reasons, it is not yet sufficiently well defined to be (considered) the best among the mediocre. 11,12 Our data suggest that the reevaluation of hemorrhagic and thrombotic risk in these patients should be a precise role of the emergency physician. In our patients the percentage of those with Has-Bled≥3 was quite high at the time of the traumatic event, but nevertheless they were anticoagulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In our patients the percentage of those with Has-Bled≥3 was quite high at the time of the traumatic event, but nevertheless they were anticoagulated. Donzè et al 11 observed that in unselected patients the scores have little power to predict the risk of major bleeding and do not seem superior to the physicians' subjective evaluation; others authors 9 report that diabetes and heart failure are potential risk factors for bleeding, but are not included in the HASBled. White 13 comments that the risk of bleeding is dynamic and associated with multiple factors that often cannot be measured as intercurrent diseases, INR control, trauma and falls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all of these risk scores have performed relatively poorly in subsequent cohorts, and none is better than physician estimation alone. 27,28 Nonetheless, there is concern that clinicians are using these scores inappropriately, in an attempt to determine a net clinical benefit of OAC therapy in individual circumstances. The bleeding-risk scores have not been validated for this use; rather, they are designed to aid the clinician in identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as high blood pressure, abnormal renal or liver function, potential medication interactions, and alcohol use.…”
Section: Underuse Of Oral Anticoagulants For Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrimentioning
confidence: 99%