2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2005.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
925
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,804 publications
(989 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(3 reference statements)
4
925
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This system models the signature as a holistic multidimensional vector composed of the best performing 40-feature subset extracted in [20] from the total set of 100 global features described in [19]. In the present study, we used this 40-feature representation of the signatures normalizing each of them to the range [0,1] using tanh-estimators [25]. Finally, the similarity scores are computed using the Mahalanobis distance between the input vector and a statistical model of the attacked client estimated using a number of training signatures.…”
Section: On-line and Off-line Signature Recognition Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system models the signature as a holistic multidimensional vector composed of the best performing 40-feature subset extracted in [20] from the total set of 100 global features described in [19]. In the present study, we used this 40-feature representation of the signatures normalizing each of them to the range [0,1] using tanh-estimators [25]. Finally, the similarity scores are computed using the Mahalanobis distance between the input vector and a statistical model of the attacked client estimated using a number of training signatures.…”
Section: On-line and Off-line Signature Recognition Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This basic fusion method consists of averaging the matching scores provided by the different matchers. Under some mild statistical assumptions [20,21] and with the proper matching score normalization [22], this simple method is demonstrated to give good results for the biometric authentication problem. This fact is corroborated in a number of studies [21,23].…”
Section: Quality-based Score Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present two approaches for combining evidence based on generalized densities: (i) the product rule, which assumes independence between the individual modalities, and (ii) copula models, which parametrically model the dependence between the matching scores of multiple modalities. Our proposed method bypasses the need for score normalization and selection of optimal weights for the score combination on a case-by-case basis [3,9,10], and therefore, is a more principled approach with performance comparable to the commonly used fusion methods. Experiments have shown that our method achieves consistently high performance over the MSU and NIST multimodal databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%