2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scoping the field of disaster exercise evaluation - A literature overview and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To answer this question, this study firstly explored the quality of the evaluation methodology of evaluation reports used in the Netherlands, adopting the methodology applied by Beerens and Tehler. 20 Secondly, this study assumed that the learning behavior in individuals, teams, or organizations participating in the exercises is accompanied by a decrease in the number of items for improvement in exercise evaluations over time. This decrease is considered an indication for learning behavior and, as such, the change in number of items for improvement over time when comparing the reports from two moments in time was calculated as a proxy for learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer this question, this study firstly explored the quality of the evaluation methodology of evaluation reports used in the Netherlands, adopting the methodology applied by Beerens and Tehler. 20 Secondly, this study assumed that the learning behavior in individuals, teams, or organizations participating in the exercises is accompanied by a decrease in the number of items for improvement in exercise evaluations over time. This decrease is considered an indication for learning behavior and, as such, the change in number of items for improvement over time when comparing the reports from two moments in time was calculated as a proxy for learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have concluded evaluation of disaster preparedness efforts is usually not scientifically rigorous (Hsu, et al, 2004;Jose & Dufrene, 2014;Williams, Nocera, & Casteel, 2008). Methods used for evaluation are heterogeneous and often not well-described (Beerens & Tehler, 2016). Most studies reviewed in Beerens and Tehler's (2016) scoping review, for example, did not provide an explanation of why their training format made sense or why they selected a specific evaluation method over others.…”
Section: Take Down Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods used for evaluation are heterogeneous and often not well-described (Beerens & Tehler, 2016). Most studies reviewed in Beerens and Tehler's (2016) scoping review, for example, did not provide an explanation of why their training format made sense or why they selected a specific evaluation method over others. Few standardized assessment tools exist (Gallardo, et al, 2015), and control groups are rarely used (Williams, Nocera, & Casteel, 2008).…”
Section: Take Down Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breakages are the most common accident faced by tailings dams [1]. The consequences of tailings dam failures are often catastrophic [2]; they can cause huge environmental and human losses, are a serious threat to the life and property of downstream residents and are a major source of environmental pollution that cause secondary disasters [3,4]. Therefore, it is necessary to research the early warning signs of tailings dam failure to improve safety conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%