2019
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scoping review protocol: is there a role for physical activity interventions in the treatment pathway of bladder cancer?

Abstract: IntroductionPatients with bladder cancer (BC) have been found to have worse experiences than those with other cancers which may partly be due to impact on quality of life. Currently, little is known about the impact of physical activity (PA) on BC outcomes. This scoping review aims to identify what interventions are available, their reported efficacy and feasibility, and a description of potential underlying biological mechanisms for their effects.Methods and analysisPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three systematic reviews were conducted following the PRISMA guidelines 11 to specifically address the following 3 questions for BC patients: Details on methodology have been reported elsewhere. [12][13][14][15] Phase 2…”
Section: Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three systematic reviews were conducted following the PRISMA guidelines 11 to specifically address the following 3 questions for BC patients: Details on methodology have been reported elsewhere. [12][13][14][15] Phase 2…”
Section: Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the efficacy and feasibility of existing PA interventions in the BC care pathway and to identify the gaps in the current research on the influence of PA on BC management, a detailed protocol of this scoping review has been published elsewhere 15 and a brief summary is presented in figure 1 . Briefly, our methods were developed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, 16 and the methodological guidelines were developed by Levac et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the evidence base it still in its infancy to clearly understand the utility and validity of such preoperative care intervention in bladder cancer. 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 In particular, the efficacy of pre-/or rehabilitation interventions on RC patient reported outcomes (PROs), and patient centered outcomes has not yet been critically appraised through existing reviews in this clinical area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%