2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scope and limitations of methods of mandibular reconstruction: a long-term follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
91
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
91
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 In one study, preoperative radiotherapy was an independent adverse factor, 3 but we found that only postoperative radiotherapy had an adverse effect, which could explain the differences in outcome between the 2 studies. Earlier studies indicated that reconstruction with a free vascularised bone flap was superior to reconstruction with a free vascularised fasciocutaneous flap together with a reconstruction plate, 4-8 but we found no correlation between treatment and survival of the plate, which might be the result of selection bias; if patients were not fit enough to have free vascularised bone flaps, soft tissue free vascularised fasciocutaneous reconstruction together with a reconstruction plate was done.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,2 In one study, preoperative radiotherapy was an independent adverse factor, 3 but we found that only postoperative radiotherapy had an adverse effect, which could explain the differences in outcome between the 2 studies. Earlier studies indicated that reconstruction with a free vascularised bone flap was superior to reconstruction with a free vascularised fasciocutaneous flap together with a reconstruction plate, 4-8 but we found no correlation between treatment and survival of the plate, which might be the result of selection bias; if patients were not fit enough to have free vascularised bone flaps, soft tissue free vascularised fasciocutaneous reconstruction together with a reconstruction plate was done.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Reported complications with plates are loosening of the osteosynthesis screws, fractures of the plate, and intraoral or extraoral exposure or infection with rates of complications that range from 28% to 39%. 1,2 In the department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, Martin 2.7 reconstruction plates are used for bridging mandibular defects with or without a vascularised free (bone) flap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Several studies have reported that failure of a graft is associated with smoking. 8,14 However, whether smoking influences the development of complications and the success rate may depend on the volume of the autogenous bone graft. Another potential explanation for this lack of association may be the multistage approach, which compensates for any bony resorption after the first reconstructive procedure.…”
Section: Bacteria Isolatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pelat rekonstruksi mandibula dan sekrup merupakan alat aloplastik yang paling banyak digunakan untuk rekonstruksi mandibula (Clement dkk., 1997;Maurer, 2010).Logam yang paling banyak digunakan untuk pembuatan pelat-pelat ini adalah stainless steel, vitalium dan titanium. Pelat rekonstruksi stainless steel dan titanium telah dikembangkan dalam usaha untuk mendapatkan pilihan rekonstruktif mandibula yang cepat, single-staged, dan terpercaya dalam mem pertahankan fungsi dan bentuk rongga mulut, tetapi penggunaan pelat rekonstruksi ini menunjukan derajat keberhasilan yang berbeda (Clement dkk., 1997).…”
Section: Pengantarunclassified