SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Leiner, Tim; Bogaert, Jan; Friedrich, Matthias G.; Mohiaddin, Raad H.; Muthurangu, Vivek; Myerson, Saul G.; Powell, A.; Raman, Subha V.; Pennell, Dudley J.

doi:10.1186/s12968-020-00682-4

Cited by 209 publications

(154 citation statements)

References 354 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

135

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although it is in line with the current literature, the bias observed between the two sequences in RVEF measurement (∼10%) is clinically relevant and must be taken into consideration in CHD follow-up [37,38]. The reason for such a bias may lie in the edge sharpness impairment induced by CS rt as compared to SSFP ref [18].…”

Section: Limitationssupporting

confidence: 85%

Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment in Congenital Heart Disease Using CMR Compressed-Sensing Real-Time Cine Imaging

Longère

Pagniez

Coisne

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objective: To evaluate the reliability of compressed-sensing (CS) real-time single-breath-hold cine imaging for quantification of right ventricular (RV) function and volumes in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients in comparison with the standard multi-breath-hold technique. Methods: Sixty-one consecutive CHD patients (mean age = 22.2 ± 9.0 (SD) years) were prospectively evaluated during either the initial work-up or after repair. For each patient, two series of cine images were acquired: first, the reference segmented multi-breath-hold steady-state free-precession sequence (SSFPref), including a short-axis stack, one four-chamber slice, and one long-axis slice; then, an additional real-time compressed-sensing single-breath-hold sequence (CSrt) providing the same slices. Two radiologists independently assessed the image quality and RV volumes for both techniques, which were compared using the Wilcoxon test and paired Student’s t test, Bland–Altman, and linear regression analyses. The visualization of wall-motion disorders and tricuspid-regurgitation-related signal voids were also analyzed. Results: The mean acquisition time for CSrt was 22.4 ± 6.2 (SD) s (95% CI: 20.8–23.9 s) versus 442.2 ± 89.9 (SD) s (95% CI: 419.2–465.2 s) for SSFPref (p < 0.001). The image quality of CSrt was diagnostic in all examinations and was mostly rated as good (n = 49/61; 80.3%). There was a high correlation between SSFPref and CSrt images regarding RV ejection fraction (49.8 ± 7.8 (SD)% (95% CI: 47.8–51.8%) versus 48.7 ± 8.6 (SD)% (95% CI: 46.5–50.9%), respectively; r = 0.94) and RV end-diastolic volume (192.9 ± 60.1 (SD) mL (95% CI: 177.5–208.3 mL) versus 194.9 ± 62.1 (SD) mL (95% CI: 179.0–210.8 mL), respectively; r = 0.98). In CSrt images, tricuspid-regurgitation and wall-motion disorder visualization was good (area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.87) and excellent (AUC = 1), respectively. Conclusions: Compressed-sensing real-time cine imaging enables, in one breath hold, an accurate assessment of RV function and volumes in CHD patients in comparison with standard SSFPref, allowing a substantial improvement in time efficiency.

show abstract

Section: Limitationssupporting

confidence: 85%

Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment in Congenital Heart Disease Using CMR Compressed-Sensing Real-Time Cine Imaging

Longère

Pagniez

Coisne

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Im Jahr 2020 sind wichtige MRT-Positionspapiere erschienen: Das „SCMR Position Paper on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance“ fasst die Indikationen für die kardiale MRT bei verschiedenen Erkrankungen zusammen. Das Positionspapier nennt die wesentlichen Publikationen für die entsprechenden Empfehlungen und stellt daher ein umfassendes und aktuelles Nachschlagewerk dar [ 12 ]. Das Positionspapier der SCMR (Society for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance) mit dem Titel „Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update“ enthält Empfehlungen zur Durchführung einer kardialen MRT-Untersuchung.…”

Section: Neue Mrt-positionspapiereunclassified

“…Das „SCMR Position Paper on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance“ fasst die Indikationen für die kardiale MRT bei verschiedenen Erkrankungen zusammen. Das Positionspapier nennt die wesentlichen Publikationen für die entsprechenden Empfehlungen und stellt daher ein umfassendes und aktuelles Nachschlagewerk dar [ 12 ].…”

Section: Neue Mrt-positionspapiereunclassified

Entwicklung kardiovaskuläre Medizin 2020: Kardiale Magnetresonanztomographie

Knobelsdorff

2021

Kardiologe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Die kardiale Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) hat sich als wichtiges nicht-invasives Diagnostikverfahren innerhalb der Kardiologie etabliert und entwickelt sich stetig weiter. Dieser Beitrag stellt beispielhaft drei interessante MRT-Studien der letzten Monate vor, die die Themen „MRT und COVID-19“, „Fibrose bei Aortenklappenstenose“ und „MRT und künstliche Intelligenz“ behandeln. Außerdem werden neue MRT-Positionspapiere zu den Bereichen „MRT-Indikationen“, „MRT-Protokolle“, „MRT-Postprocessing“ und „MRT-Normwerte“ beschrieben. Darüber hinaus wird die Rolle der kardialen MRT in den 2020 erschienenen kardiologischen Leitlinien der European Society of Cardiology und der American Heart Association dargestellt. Schließlich folgt eine aktuelle Bilanz der MRT-Zertifizierung durch die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie.

show abstract

“…Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a robust, reproducible and safe method for non-invasive evaluation of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Strengths of CMR include precise assessment of cardiac anatomy and function [ 1 ] and multi-parametric tissue characterization [ 2 ]. CMR is recommended for diagnosis and management of multiple CVDs [ 3 – 5 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in women with cardiovascular disease: position statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR)

Ordovás

Baldassarre

Bucciarelli-Ducci

et al. 2021

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This document is a position statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) on recommendations for clinical utilization of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in women with cardiovascular disease. The document was prepared by the SCMR Consensus Group on CMR Imaging for Female Patients with Cardiovascular Disease and endorsed by the SCMR Publications Committee and SCMR Executive Committee. The goals of this document are to (1) guide the informed selection of cardiovascular imaging methods, (2) inform clinical decision-making, (3) educate stakeholders on the advantages of CMR in specific clinical scenarios, and (4) empower patients with clinical evidence to participate in their clinical care. The statements of clinical utility presented in the current document pertain to the following clinical scenarios: acute coronary syndrome, stable ischemic heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, aortic syndrome and congenital heart disease in pregnancy, bicuspid aortic valve and aortopathies, systemic rheumatic diseases and collagen vascular disorders, and cardiomyopathy-causing mutations. The authors cite published evidence when available and provide expert consensus otherwise. Most of the evidence available pertains to translational studies involving subjects of both sexes. However, the authors have prioritized review of data obtained from female patients, and direct comparison of CMR between women and men. This position statement does not consider CMR accessibility or availability of local expertise, but instead highlights the optimal utilization of CMR in women with known or suspected cardiovascular disease. Finally, the ultimate goal of this position statement is to improve the health of female patients with cardiovascular disease by providing specific recommendations on the use of CMR.

show abstract

SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Cited by 209 publications

References 354 publications

Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment in Congenital Heart Disease Using CMR Compressed-Sensing Real-Time Cine Imaging

Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment in Congenital Heart Disease Using CMR Compressed-Sensing Real-Time Cine Imaging

Entwicklung kardiovaskuläre Medizin 2020: Kardiale Magnetresonanztomographie

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in women with cardiovascular disease: position statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About