2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2017.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sclerosing alcohol injections for the management of intermetatarsal neuromas: A systematic review

Abstract: An intermetatarsal neuroma is a plantar digital neuritis causing metatarsalgia of the affected inter-metatarsal space. At present the evidence to support the management of the condition is poor with only some quality evidence supporting the short-term management of intermetatarsal neuromas using steroid injections. Some authors have supported the use of alcohol sclerosing intra-lesional injections to treat intermetatarsal neuromas. Following a search of the evidence 11 articles were identified. The systematic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the short-term effects, Perini et al also noted diminished short-term pain after injection in 73% of their patients (P \ 0.001) [11]. However, there were side effects that resulted in pain in the injection site, skin lesions, tissue alterations consist with ''steroid flare,'' tissue atrophy, and pigment alterations [9,11].…”
Section: Steroidmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the short-term effects, Perini et al also noted diminished short-term pain after injection in 73% of their patients (P \ 0.001) [11]. However, there were side effects that resulted in pain in the injection site, skin lesions, tissue alterations consist with ''steroid flare,'' tissue atrophy, and pigment alterations [9,11].…”
Section: Steroidmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…More recently, one randomized study indicated that though both treatments improved outcomes for 18 months, corticosteroids had a greater improvement than PRP within 1 month of injection, and PRP had a more positive effect than ICS at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-ups [38]. Conversely, two other studies found that ICS and PRP both improved outcomes up to 16 weeks and 6 months, respectively, with no difference between level of improvement due to the two treatments [8,9].…”
Section: Plantar Fasciitismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations