2015
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scleroderma dermal microvascular endothelial cells exhibit defective response to pro-angiogenic chemokines

Abstract: Our results show that SSc ECs are unable to respond to pro-angiogenic chemokines despite their increased expression in serum and ECs. This might be due to the differences in the signalling pathways activated by these chemokines in normal vs SSc ECs. In addition, the lower expression of Id-1 also decreases the angiogenic response. The inability of pro-angiogenic chemokines to promote EC migration provides an additional mechanism for the impaired angiogenesis that characterizes SSc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…eNOS = endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase (see Figure 1 for other definitions). adox), we showed previously that these cells do respond to higher levels of VEGF (33), which strengthens the argument that overexpressing CYR-61 in fibroblasts might increase the angiogenic potential of SSc ECs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…eNOS = endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase (see Figure 1 for other definitions). adox), we showed previously that these cells do respond to higher levels of VEGF (33), which strengthens the argument that overexpressing CYR-61 in fibroblasts might increase the angiogenic potential of SSc ECs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is possible, since cross‐talk between ECs and fibroblasts in SSc has been documented . Although VEGF has a limited effect on SSc ECs (the so‐called VEGF paradox), we showed previously that these cells do respond to higher levels of VEGF , which strengthens the argument that overexpressing CYR‐61 in fibroblasts might increase the angiogenic potential of SSc ECs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Indeed, endothelial dysfunction is considered a pivotal factor contributing to peripheral vessel remodelling in SSc 3 15 41. A defective response to proangiogenic stimuli and several functional defects, such as an impaired ability to organise into capillary-like tubes in vitro, have been extensively reported in SSc-dMVECs 28 29 35 41 46. Moreover, transcriptome profiling studies have revealed profound differences in the expression of genes encoding a variety of angiogenic regulators between SSc-dMVECs and H-dMVECs 41 47.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on this aspect have proven that through promoting the expression of genes such MMP‐2 and MMP‐9, Id‐1 can promote damage to structures of the basement membrane and accelerate the infiltration of tumors in colorectal cancer tissues . Furthermore, Id‐1 can induce the proliferation of endothelial cells in blood vessels and promote the formation of blood capillaries and lymphatic microvessels through increasing expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), providing the necessary material foundation for the infiltration and metastasis of tumors . The results of the Transwell chamber and Matrigel experiments revealed that the migration and invasion abilities of SW480 and HT‐29 human colonic cancer cells with the interfering sequence of Id‐1 were significantly lower than that in the blank groups and blank load groups, proving that the overexpression of Id‐1 could promote the invasion and metastasis of tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%