1976
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.14.1832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scission-point model of nuclear fission based on deformed-shell effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
386
1
5

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 613 publications
(421 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
17
386
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The dip in the calculation and the data at A ∼ 132 is at the same point as the peak of TKE(A H ) due to the shell-driven fragment deformation pointed out in Ref. [25]. Although the agreement is good, the observed behavior is not perfectly reproduced.…”
Section: Fragment Energiessupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dip in the calculation and the data at A ∼ 132 is at the same point as the peak of TKE(A H ) due to the shell-driven fragment deformation pointed out in Ref. [25]. Although the agreement is good, the observed behavior is not perfectly reproduced.…”
Section: Fragment Energiessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…At A H = 132, the heavy fragment is close to the doubly-magic closed shell having Z H = 50 and N H = 82 and is therefore resistant to distortions away from sphericity, as first discussed in Ref. [25]. Consequently, the scission configuration is fairly compact, causing the TKE to exhibit a maximum even though the complementary light fragment is far from a closed shell and hence significantly deformed.…”
Section: Fragment Energiesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…As the yield of nuclide with N=82 shell may be enhanced, the most probable charge increases and consequently deviates from ZQgg. The same kind of explanation is applicable to the disagreement at other nuclear shell and deformed shell, N=86-88, which is suggested by Wilkins et al 67 The existence of the nuclear shell effect in this energy region was also reported in the isomeric yield ratio measurement. 68 On the other hand, the reason why Zp dose not seem to agree with ZQgg in the 24 MeV proton + 232Th system is probably because of the inadequate correction of emitted neutrons.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…These measurements provided a precise characterization of the fissioning systems at scission and allowed to determine the prescission neutron multiplicities from the isotopic composition of the final fragments and their velocities using momentum conservation and the the kinematic model for fission from Ref. [65]. The results are shown in the upper panel of Fig.…”
Section: Saddle-to-scission Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%