2017
DOI: 10.1080/10556788.2017.1335312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SCIP: global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs in a branch-and-cut framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
127
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
127
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Ref. [29], the general list of feasible nonconvex global MINLP solvers contains ANTIGONE [30], BARON [31], Couenne [32], LindoGlobal [33], and SCIP [34]. According to the results of the comparative solver study [26].…”
Section: Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ref. [29], the general list of feasible nonconvex global MINLP solvers contains ANTIGONE [30], BARON [31], Couenne [32], LindoGlobal [33], and SCIP [34]. According to the results of the comparative solver study [26].…”
Section: Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower bounding scenario subproblems, however, remain nonconvex because we need to simultaneously handle the controller settings and the dynamic model response. This observation highlights that the decomposition scheme is limited by the scope of off‐the‐shelf global optimization solvers (such as SCIP and BARON) (which are needed to solve the scenario subproblems). We also highlight that a global optimization framework for SPs can also exploit more advanced techniques that handle differential equations in a simulation‐based setting .…”
Section: Computational Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now proceed to certify that the controller settings obtained with IPOPT are globally optimal (we recall that this is a local solver so there is no guarantee that the solution is globally optimal). To do this, we solve expected value problems with increasing number of scenarios with SNGO (which exploits the nearly separable structure of the problem) and with the off‐the‐shelf global solver SCIP . The results are presented in Table .…”
Section: Numerical Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some softwares, implementing the methods described above, are available for solving (P ). See for instance Couenne 0.5 [11], Baron [51], Scip 3.2.1 [1,58]. Another frequently used technique to obtain convex relaxations of (P ) is semi-definite programming, see for example [5,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%