2019
DOI: 10.3390/condmat4010024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scintillator Pixel Detectors for Measurement of Compton Scattering

Abstract: The Compton scattering of gamma rays is commonly detected using two detector layers, the first for detection of the recoil electron and the second for the scattered gamma. We have assembled detector modules consisting of scintillation pixels, which are able to detect and reconstruct the Compton scattering of gammas with only one readout layer. This substantially reduces the number of electronic channels and opens the possibility to construct cost-efficient Compton scattering detectors for various applications … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For scattering angles θ > 60 • , there is a possible ambiguity in the determination of the pixel corresponding to the recoil electron and the pixel corresponding to the scattered gamma, since a scattering at a forward angle can result in the same energy responses of the pixels as a scattering at one backward angle. However, the forward scattering is always favored owing to the higher cross-section and the lower absorption probability of the scattered gamma [14]. The azimuthal angle, φ, is reconstructed from the relative position of the two fired pixels in a module.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For scattering angles θ > 60 • , there is a possible ambiguity in the determination of the pixel corresponding to the recoil electron and the pixel corresponding to the scattered gamma, since a scattering at a forward angle can result in the same energy responses of the pixels as a scattering at one backward angle. However, the forward scattering is always favored owing to the higher cross-section and the lower absorption probability of the scattered gamma [14]. The azimuthal angle, φ, is reconstructed from the relative position of the two fired pixels in a module.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The azimuthal angle, φ, is reconstructed from the relative position of the two fired pixels in a module. The angular uncertainty is caused by the uncertainty of the interaction position within a pixel, and it depends on the distance, d, of the fired pixels in a module as [14]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3-4). Traditionally, Compton detection has been performed using multiple detector layers, but a recent paper outlined the criteria for localizing and decomposing Compton interactions using singleended readout, citing high resolution DOI readout as a key feature for Compton scatter recovery (31). A uniform light guide is not optimal for this task because the SiPM pattern of individual events is random, whereas our Prism-PET modules create a deterministic light sharing pattern regardless of the interaction location inside the primary scintillator column ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the framework for performing accurate Compton localization using single-ended readout depthencoding modules was laid out in a recent paper, demonstrating that high DOI resolution is a critical component in determining the primary interaction site [48]. Based on the existing literature and our CNN results, we expect that our neural network approach for DOI estimation may be translatable to perform…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 93%