2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/R 2016
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2016.8069382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scintillator-based Photon Counting Detector: Is it feasible?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. [18] and Fig. 2a we show that by changing the laser pulse duration the roughness of the interface between the optical barriers and the crystal bulk can be altered.…”
Section: Scintillator Processing Using Liobmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In Ref. [18] and Fig. 2a we show that by changing the laser pulse duration the roughness of the interface between the optical barriers and the crystal bulk can be altered.…”
Section: Scintillator Processing Using Liobmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, we have shown that the roughness of the interface between the barriers and the unmodified crystal can be controlled to some extent by varying laser parameters (Bläckberg et al 2016a). However, to this date, and to the best of our knowledge, no one has been able to show exactly how different laser parameters are linked to the optical barrier properties.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially a complex task given the large laser parameter space in combination with difficulties to use standard methods to measure the barrier properties in thick crystals. In this work we chose a range of RI values and interface roughness values that are possible to achieve based on our prior experimental results (Sabet et al 2014, Bläckberg et al 2016a) and the literature. Given that the RI and the interface roughness are two distinct parameters and not necessarily correlated, all combinations of the two parameters were studied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bottleneck for development of a ScPCD for CT has been the need for very fine pixelation, which has not been possible using standard mechanical array fabrication techniques. While conventional microcolumnar and some recent high resolution scintillator developments [29][30][31][32] have not been shown capable of high rate CT applications, there are other recent enabling technologies for fine-pitch scintillator array fabrication using laser beams that have shown promise [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%