Scientometric portrait of nobel laureate Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin

Kademani, B. S.; Kalyane, V. L.; Jange, Suresh

doi:10.1007/bf02458435

Cited by 19 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 8 publications

(1 reference statement)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One of the first writers to suggest scientific papers as a measure of research productivity was Nobel laureate William Shockley 4 who was interested in measuring the research productivity among individuals within a group by analyzing their publications. A few scientometric studies on Nobel laureates [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and studies on other scientists [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] have been published.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status

et al. 2005

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper attempts to highlight the scientific productivity, productivity age, collaboration trend, domains of contributions of eight Nobel laureates of past and present belonging to different domains of research in science. Also attempts to document the various factors that affect productivity of scientists. No Nobel laureates can be compared with other Nobel laureates as they are an altogether different class of scientific elites and each piece of research is unique by itself.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status

et al. 2005

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Synchronous Self-Referencing Rates (SSRRs) for S. Chandrasekhar (Kademani et al, 1996a) in various domains were: Plasma physics (20.4%); Stochastic, statistical hydromagnetic problem in physics and astronomy (19.6%); Mathematical theory of black holes and colliding waves (19.4%); Stellar structure and stellar atmosphere (17.8%); Radiative transfer and negative ion of hydrogen (14.9%); Tensor-virial theorem (14.3%); Relativistic astrophysics (12.6%); and Hydromagnetic and hydrodynamic stability (10.5%); the SSRRs for C.V. Raman (Kademani et al, 1994) in various domains were: Floral colours and visual perception (26.9%); Physics of crystals (26.4%); Optics (19.7%); Optics of minerals and diamonds (19.6%); Acoustics (11.7%); and Scattering of light (5.6%). The SSRRs for K.S.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The SSRRs for K.S. Krishnan (Kademani et al, 1996b) for various domains were: Thermionics (19.0%); Magnetism (14.8%); and Spectroscopy (9.8%). The SSRRs for R.K. Mitra (Kalyane et al, 2001b), calculated domain-wise, were: Methodology (16.7%); Biochemical genetics (14.8%); Molecular biology (11.6%); Bioenergetics (9.7%); Plant biochemistry (4.2%); and Biotechnology (0.0%).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

H.J. Bhabha: a case study of synchronous references

Swarna¹,

Kalyane²,

Prakasan³

et al. 2006

IJNKM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quantitative analysis of the events of synchronous references in the research papers followed throughout the publishing career of an individual scientist revealed interesting highlights on the knowledge-generating-system. In the case study of Homi Jehangir Bhabha, the first quinquennium and fifth quinquennium of his research career had low self-references; the third quinquennium and the fourth quinquennium had moderate self-references; whereas the second quinquennium had the highest number of self-references. The two major clusters of self-references occurring during the second and third quinquenniums were indicators of active periods of knowledge-generating and faster communications.

show abstract

“…Raman has published more than 480 research papers (own and collaborated) and guided a large number of research students, many of whom went into scientific eminence and achievement in their own right [RAMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE, 2006]. There has been one study highlighting quantitative aspects of Raman's research commutations based on his published research papers [KADEMANI & AL., 1994].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Sustained impact of publications of C.V. Raman

2008

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

C.V. Raman is being acknowledged by worldwide physics community for his classic works. The present study has made an effort to analyze how much impact in number of citation receiving for his publications. Of course, there was a lack of tools for such a study some years back. The study has limited to the database Science Citation Index for the period 1982-2005. The noteworthy results are: One third of his research papers have been cited at least once; The research papers published during 1918-1940 could make remarkable impact; Three of his papers have shown an upward growth in number of citations receiving; The total citations to papers of age 46 and 54 as on the year 1982 accounted for more than 50 per cent of the total citations received; Research works in the 'Acoustics' area have been cited more than any other area of his works; Eponymal citations are to be explored and analysed to understand the real impact of his works.

show abstract

Scientometric portrait of nobel laureate Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin

Cited by 19 publications

References 8 publications

Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status

Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status

H.J. Bhabha: a case study of synchronous references

Sustained impact of publications of C.V. Raman

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About