2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01139.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Working Group on Materials Analysis Position on Hair Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other hair shaft-based forensic methods can be problematic. Microscopic hair comparison, while heavily used historically, does not have the potential for rigorous statistical and scientific analysis[1, 29, 62, 67, 68]. Previous attempts to use abundance patterns of solubilized hair proteins in two-dimensional electrophoresis protein gels were insensitive, irreproducible, and proved susceptible to environmental factors[6971].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other hair shaft-based forensic methods can be problematic. Microscopic hair comparison, while heavily used historically, does not have the potential for rigorous statistical and scientific analysis[1, 29, 62, 67, 68]. Previous attempts to use abundance patterns of solubilized hair proteins in two-dimensional electrophoresis protein gels were insensitive, irreproducible, and proved susceptible to environmental factors[6971].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopic examination of hair evidence can take into account features such as pigmentation (granule distribution and density, spectral analysis), cosmetic treatment (dye, bleach), diameter, appearance in cross-section and structural abnormalities of the shaft. Using all these features permits useful discrimination whether a given hair originates from a specific individual (Gaudette, 1999), leading to the recommendation that hair analysis should begin with a thorough microscopic examination (Lanning et al, 2009). Nevertheless, the search for more objective criteria by which to judge hair matches continues (Taupin, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA in such cases is commonly present in bloodstains, although items with other bodily fluids, such as saliva, 20 or epithelial cells (touch DNA) are also suitable for evaluation, 12,21,22 as are hair samples. 23 Positive results have been obtained when evaluating various weapon types, 24,25 including exploded pipe bombs, 26 as well as ammunition and its component parts. [27][28][29] Numerous examples of the suspect's DNA being identified on weapons exist in the presented series of cases.…”
Section: Linking An Object To a Crimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of sufficient root material, mitochondrial DNA testing may be performed. 23,60,61 Summary DNA testing may provide valuable investigative information and evidentiary value in homicide investigations by linking a suspect or an object to a crime, by allowing for the determination of the sequence of events, by providing powerful corroborating evidence, and by potentially influencing a defendant's plea. The cases serve to illustrate that the current state of DNA testing can allow for testing of various items of evidence, such as animal feces and cartridge casings, that, in years past, might not have been considered very useful evidence or, if valuable in other regards, might not have been considered a viable source for potential DNA testing.…”
Section: Dna and Hairmentioning
confidence: 99%