2018
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 50th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR)

Abstract: In accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) 396/2005, EFSA received a request from the European Commission to provide support for the preparation of the EU position for 50th session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR). In 2017, Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) evaluated 15 active substances regarding the setting of toxicological reference values to be used in consumer risk assessment (bicyclopyrone, chlormequat, cyclaniliprole, fenazaquin, fenpropimorph, fenpyrazamine, fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EFSA based the assessment on the following documents: the conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance oxamyl (EFSA, 2022 ); the reasoned opinion on the review of the existing MRLs for oxamyl according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 (EFSA, 2010 ); the scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 50th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR) (EFSA, 2018 b); the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide residues (JMPR) Evaluation report (FAO, 2018 ); the Report of the 50th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (FAO/WHO, 2018); information provided upon request to European Commission by the European Union Reference Laboratories for Pesticide Residues (EURLs). …”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…EFSA based the assessment on the following documents: the conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance oxamyl (EFSA, 2022 ); the reasoned opinion on the review of the existing MRLs for oxamyl according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 (EFSA, 2010 ); the scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 50th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR) (EFSA, 2018 b); the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide residues (JMPR) Evaluation report (FAO, 2018 ); the Report of the 50th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (FAO/WHO, 2018); information provided upon request to European Commission by the European Union Reference Laboratories for Pesticide Residues (EURLs). …”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 50th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR) (EFSA, 2018 b);…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EFSA based its assessment on the evaluation report submitted by the EMS the Netherlands (Netherlands, 2021a , b ) the renewal assessment report (RAR) and its revision (United Kingdom, 2016 , 2017 ) prepared under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance trifloxystrobin (EFSA, 2017 ), the Commission review report on trifloxystrobin (European Commission, 2018 ) as well as the conclusions from previous EFSA opinions and scientific reports on trifloxystrobin, including the reasoned opinion on the MRL review according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 (EFSA, 2014a , b , 2016a , b , 2018c , d , 2019b ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFSA updated the calculation with the relevant STMR values derived from the residue trials submitted in support of the present MRL applications and, in addition, with the STMRs derived in EFSA opinions issued after the MRL review (EFSA, 2014b , 2016a , 2018c , 2019b ). For those commodities where the CXLs have been implemented in the EU legislation after the MRL review, the respective STMR values as derived by the JMPR were used (FAO, 2004 , 2015 , 2017 ; EFSA, 2016b , 2018d ). The complete list of input values can be found in Appendix D.2 .…”
Section: Consumer Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%