2016
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 48th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR)

Abstract: In accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) 396/2005, EFSA received a request from the European Commission to provide support for the preparation of the EU position for 48th session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR). In 2015, JMPR evaluated 12 active substances regarding the setting of toxicological reference values to be used in consumer risk assessment (abamectin, acetochlor, cyazofamid, ethephon, flonicamid, fluazifop-p-butyl, flumioxazin, flupyradifurone, lindane, lufenuron, penconaz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shokrzadeh et al, 2009 [ 105 ] analysed lindane concentration in cultivated fish as well as the most consumed fish in the Caspian Sea and found levels did not to pose any risk and that the lindane concentration was significantly higher in fish than in the sea cucumbers. This is in accordance with evaluation by EFSA [ 104 ]. It is important to monitor lindane in marine animals but for now seafood consumption is not suggested to pose any risks.…”
Section: Hazardssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shokrzadeh et al, 2009 [ 105 ] analysed lindane concentration in cultivated fish as well as the most consumed fish in the Caspian Sea and found levels did not to pose any risk and that the lindane concentration was significantly higher in fish than in the sea cucumbers. This is in accordance with evaluation by EFSA [ 104 ]. It is important to monitor lindane in marine animals but for now seafood consumption is not suggested to pose any risks.…”
Section: Hazardssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The use of lindane has been banned worldwide and the MRL is 100 ng/g in fish set by the Codex Alimentarius Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR). Currently no EU MRLs are set for fish [ 104 ]. Shokrzadeh et al, 2009 [ 105 ] analysed lindane concentration in cultivated fish as well as the most consumed fish in the Caspian Sea and found levels did not to pose any risk and that the lindane concentration was significantly higher in fish than in the sea cucumbers.…”
Section: Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… b Residue values in the FAO ( 2015 ) estimation of STMRs in products of animal origin are the sum of cyantraniliprole and metabolites IN‐N7B69, IN‐J9Z38, IN‐MLA84 and IN‐MYX98, expressed as cyantraniliprole. The range of metabolites in the FAO estimated STMRs is broader than the EU risk assessment residue definition, however these values were considered appropriate for use in the exposure calculation without adaptation (EFSA, 2016c ). …”
Section: Appendix D – Input Values For the Exposure Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFSA based its assessment on the evaluation report submitted by the EMS the Netherlands (Netherlands, 2021a , b ) the renewal assessment report (RAR) and its revision (United Kingdom, 2016 , 2017 ) prepared under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance trifloxystrobin (EFSA, 2017 ), the Commission review report on trifloxystrobin (European Commission, 2018 ) as well as the conclusions from previous EFSA opinions and scientific reports on trifloxystrobin, including the reasoned opinion on the MRL review according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 (EFSA, 2014a , b , 2016a , b , 2018c , d , 2019b ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFSA updated the calculation with the relevant STMR values derived from the residue trials submitted in support of the present MRL applications and, in addition, with the STMRs derived in EFSA opinions issued after the MRL review (EFSA, 2014b , 2016a , 2018c , 2019b ). For those commodities where the CXLs have been implemented in the EU legislation after the MRL review, the respective STMR values as derived by the JMPR were used (FAO, 2004 , 2015 , 2017 ; EFSA, 2016b , 2018d ). The complete list of input values can be found in Appendix D.2 .…”
Section: Consumer Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%