2022
DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific response to a cluster of shark bites

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is generally comparable to sonar surveys of natural areas of the GBR coast. In a sheltered bay in the Whitsunday Islands, Barnett et al (2022) encountered between 1 and 89 large fish per ~2km transect, with an average of 13, and encountered between 1 and 11 marine megafauna per ~2km transect, with an average of 6. These data are not directly comparable, as the extent, type, and scale of structurally complex habitat differ greatly between study areas.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is generally comparable to sonar surveys of natural areas of the GBR coast. In a sheltered bay in the Whitsunday Islands, Barnett et al (2022) encountered between 1 and 89 large fish per ~2km transect, with an average of 13, and encountered between 1 and 11 marine megafauna per ~2km transect, with an average of 6. These data are not directly comparable, as the extent, type, and scale of structurally complex habitat differ greatly between study areas.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gonzalez-Socoloske et al, 2009;Papastamatiou et al, 2020). The utility of sonar imaging in surveying mobile marine fauna has been trailed and tested successfully, including on known tethered or captive animal targets, demonstrating that consumer grade side-scan sonar can detect entire body structures of fish and sharks, including fine structures like caudal, pelvic and pectoral fins (Fleming et al, 2018;Barnett et al, 2022). This technique is unlikely to provide effective detection of smaller animals, invertebrates, and highly bottom associated mobile marine fauna.…”
Section: Sonar Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such incidents are rare, with a confirmed 73 unprovoked shark bites on humans worldwide in 2021 ( Accessed on 1 July 2022); however, the number of reported shark bite incidents and fatalities has risen since records began [ 2 ], causing increasing levels of community concern [ 3 ]. The negative impacts of these incidents has led to a variety of shark hazard mitigation measures being implemented that are predominantly designed to reduce the likelihood of ocean users being bitten [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Historically, most shark hazard mitigation measures were designed to kill target species, with less emphasis on minimising impacts on harmless species [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%