Scientific Research on the Efficiency of Public Expenditures: How and Where is it Going?

́Ana, Tomás Dias Sant; Lopes, André Vaz; Miranda, Rodrigo Fontenelle de Araújo; Bermejo, Paulo Henrique de Souza; Demo, Gisela

doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1660995

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, in addition to the business context, the application of the innovation ecosystem within universities is still scarce (Grobbelaar, 2018). Future research should also assess the efficiency and cost reduction impacts of administrative innovations in procurement, human resources, and technology in the public sector (Sant'Ana et al , 2019). Exploration of how social ecosystems work in comparison with commercial ecosystems is needed to promote social entrepreneurship and improve technology diffusion and empowerment (Slimane and Lamine, 2017; Surie, 2017).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The structure of an innovation ecosystem: foundations for future research

́Ana

Bermejo

Moreira

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe concept of an innovation ecosystem, based on the idea of business ecosystem, has increasingly grown in the literature on strategy, innovation, and entrepreneurship. However, not all innovation ecosystems have the same architectural models or internal collaboration, and existing research rarely deconstructs an ecosystem of innovation and examines its structure. The objective of this article is to systematize the discussion about the structure of an innovation ecosystem and offer a foundation for future research.Design/methodology/approachUsing the Web of Science database as the source for the articles, this paper presents a systematic review of the literature on the structure of the innovation ecosystems. The period of analysis spanned from January 1993 to August 2019. Two methods, bibliometric analysis and content analysis, were used to structure the systematic review.FindingsThe results of the content analysis showed that the main classifications related to the structure of an innovation ecosystem are the ecosystem life cycle (birth, expansion, leadership, and self-renewal), the classification according to the ecosystem level (macroscopic, medium, and microscopic), and the layered structure (core–periphery structure, triple-layer structure, triple-layer core–periphery structure, and framework 6C). The results also showed that studies in the field are concentrated around a small group of authors, and few studies have discussed the structure of an ecosystem.Research limitations/implicationsThis study includes only peer-reviewed articles from the Web of Science database.Originality/valueThis article contributes to innovation ecosystem theory by exploring the characteristics that influence ecosystem structure. In addition to the theoretical contribution, the triple-layer core–periphery framework and the 6C framework set a benchmark for future research on innovation ecosystems.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The structure of an innovation ecosystem: foundations for future research

́Ana

Bermejo

Moreira

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Однако те или иные прямые наблюдения трудно обобщать: ведь отраслевые структуры этих секторов существенно различаются, часто бывают разными и институциональные среды. Как показало недавно проведенное сопоставление значительного числа эмпирических работ за последние двадцать лет, сравниваются обычно организации в отраслях образования и здравоохранения (Sant´Ana et al, 2020), так что полное сравнение госсектора с частным на основе какого-то одного индикатора провести практически невозможно (Van de Walle, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified