2013
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of straight‐chain primary aliphatic alcohols/aldehydes/acids, acetals and esters with esters containing saturated alcohols and acetals containing saturated aldehydes (chemical group 1) when used as flavourings for all animal species

Abstract: Chemical group 1 (CG 1) consists of straight-chain primary aliphatic alcohols/aldehydes/acids, acetals and esters with esters containing saturated alcohols and acetals containing saturated aldehydes of which 86 are currently authorised for use as flavours in food. The FEEDAP Panel was unable to perform an assessment of ethyl oleate because of its insufficient purity. The following compounds are considered to be safe for all animal species at the use level proposed for feed flavourings: formic acid, acetic acid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Toxicological data for subchronic studies, from which NOAEL values could be derived, were available for octyl acetate [09.007] and ethyl acetate [09.001] in CG 1 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2013 ), 2‐ethylhexan‐1‐ol [02.082] in CG 2 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012a ), citral [05.020] in CG 3 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2016a ), linalool [02.013] and terpineol 28 [02.230] in CG 6 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012b ), 1,8‐cineole in CG 16 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012e , 2021a ), eugenol [04.003] and trans ‐anethole [04.010] in CG 18 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2011 ), cinnamaldehyde [05.014] in CG 22 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2017 ), benzyl alcohol [02.010] (EFSA FAF Panel, 2019 ) and methyl salicylate [09.749] in CG 23 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012f ), benzene‐1,3‐diol [04.047] in CG 25 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012g ), 1‐methoxy‐4‐methylbenzene [04.015] in CG 26 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012h ), myrcene [01.008] and β‐caryophyllene in CG 31 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2016b ), and β‐caryophyllene oxide in CG 32 (EFSA CEF Panel, 2014 ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toxicological data for subchronic studies, from which NOAEL values could be derived, were available for octyl acetate [09.007] and ethyl acetate [09.001] in CG 1 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2013 ), 2‐ethylhexan‐1‐ol [02.082] in CG 2 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012a ), citral [05.020] in CG 3 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2016a ), linalool [02.013] and terpineol 28 [02.230] in CG 6 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012b ), 1,8‐cineole in CG 16 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012e , 2021a ), eugenol [04.003] and trans ‐anethole [04.010] in CG 18 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2011 ), cinnamaldehyde [05.014] in CG 22 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2017 ), benzyl alcohol [02.010] (EFSA FAF Panel, 2019 ) and methyl salicylate [09.749] in CG 23 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012f ), benzene‐1,3‐diol [04.047] in CG 25 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012g ), 1‐methoxy‐4‐methylbenzene [04.015] in CG 26 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012h ), myrcene [01.008] and β‐caryophyllene in CG 31 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2016b ), and β‐caryophyllene oxide in CG 32 (EFSA CEF Panel, 2014 ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous opinions of the FEEDAP Panel (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012a , b , c , 2013 , 2016a , b , 2019a , b , 2020a , b ), the 37 additives under assessment were fully characterised, with the exception of ethyl oleate [09.192], and evaluated for their safety and efficacy as flavouring substances. Ethyl oleate was excluded from further assessment.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethyl oleate [09.192] belongs to chemical group 01. In its previous assessment, the FEEDAP Panel was unable to perform an assessment of the safety of ethyl oleate for the target species, the consumer and the environment because of insufficient purity (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2013 ). The applicant has now provided analytical data which include the full characterisation of the additive and show compliance with the proposed specification.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Toxicological data of subchronic studies, from which NOAELs could be derived, were available for octyl acetate [09.007] in CG 1 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2013 ), citral [05.020] in CG 3 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2016a ), citronellol [02.011] in CG 4 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2016b ), terpineol 32 [02.230] and linalool [02.013] in CG 6 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012a ), l‐carvone [07.147] in CG 8 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2016c ), myrcene [01.008], d‐limonene [01.045], p ‐cymene [01.002] and β‐caryophyllene [01.007] in CG 31 (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2015 , 2016d ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%