2014
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Opinion on the potential reduction of the currently authorised maximum zinc content in complete feed

Abstract: A critical review of (i) the zinc requirements of food-producing and pet animals, (ii) the zinc concentration of feed materials and (iii) the calculated background zinc concentration of complete feed supports the possibility of a considerable reduction of the currently authorised maximum concentration for total zinc in feed. The FEEDAP Panel developed, based on an approximation using zinc requirements and background data, potential new maximum contents, which could replace the current ones. The newly proposed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 270 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by studies on zinc deposition in eggs (Mabe et al, 2003;Huyghebaert et al, 2006;Plaimast et al, 2008;Bahakaim et al, 2014) and milk (Kirchgessner et al, 1994;Pechova et al, 2006Pechova et al, , 2009 carried out on animals fed diets supplemented with sources of amino acid chelated with this trace element. This statement is consistent with previous reviews and meta-analyses of data from poultry, pigs and ruminants, which concluded that organic and inorganic sources of zinc, in general, are equivalent (Ammerman et al, 1998;Jongbloed et al, 2002;Schlegel et al, 2013;EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2014). This statement is consistent with previous reviews and meta-analyses of data from poultry, pigs and ruminants, which concluded that organic and inorganic sources of zinc, in general, are equivalent (Ammerman et al, 1998;Jongbloed et al, 2002;Schlegel et al, 2013;EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2014).…”
Section: Metabolic and Residue Studiessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is supported by studies on zinc deposition in eggs (Mabe et al, 2003;Huyghebaert et al, 2006;Plaimast et al, 2008;Bahakaim et al, 2014) and milk (Kirchgessner et al, 1994;Pechova et al, 2006Pechova et al, , 2009 carried out on animals fed diets supplemented with sources of amino acid chelated with this trace element. This statement is consistent with previous reviews and meta-analyses of data from poultry, pigs and ruminants, which concluded that organic and inorganic sources of zinc, in general, are equivalent (Ammerman et al, 1998;Jongbloed et al, 2002;Schlegel et al, 2013;EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2014). This statement is consistent with previous reviews and meta-analyses of data from poultry, pigs and ruminants, which concluded that organic and inorganic sources of zinc, in general, are equivalent (Ammerman et al, 1998;Jongbloed et al, 2002;Schlegel et al, 2013;EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2014).…”
Section: Metabolic and Residue Studiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The FEEDAP Panel has already considered the potential risks to the environment posed by the use of zinc in feedingstuffs up to the maximum authorised contents in the EU (EFSA, 2012b(EFSA, , 2012c(EFSA, , 2012dEFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2013c, 2014, 2015. The additive under assessment, zinc chelate of Llysinate-HCl, is intended to be a substitute for other authorised zinc additives.…”
Section: Safety For the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of zinc as a FA at currently authorised levels in marine aquaculture was predicted not to be an appreciable risk to the environment. Due to the concerns rose in the report (Monteiro et al, 2010), EFSA published an Opinion in which it proposed reducing maximum authorised levels of zinc in animal feeds (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2014). It was estimated that introducing newly proposed total maximum contents, provided they are applied in feeding practices, would result in an overall reduction in zinc emissions from animal production of about 20%.…”
Section: B33 Exposure and Effect Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%