2012
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for protein

Abstract: This opinion of the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) deals with the setting of Dietary Reference Values (DRVs) for protein. The Panel concludes that a Population Reference Intake (PRI) can be derived from nitrogen balance studies. Several health outcomes possibly associated with protein intake were also considered but data were found to be insufficient to establish DRVs. For healthy adults of both sexes, the average requirement (AR) is 0.66 g protein/kg body weight per day based o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
132
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 196 publications
0
132
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nutrient requirements and references should be differentiated from recommended intakes because of differences in the methodology for their derivation and their intention. Considering amongst other nutrient goals for a given population, reference values are translated into recommendations for managing nutritional risks (EFSA NDA Panel, 2010g NDA Panel, 2010f, 2010d, 2010a, 2012a, 2013b, 2013c, 2013d and endorsed opinions on DRVs for biotin and pantothenic acid for public consultation (EFSA NDA Panel, 2013g, 2013a.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient requirements and references should be differentiated from recommended intakes because of differences in the methodology for their derivation and their intention. Considering amongst other nutrient goals for a given population, reference values are translated into recommendations for managing nutritional risks (EFSA NDA Panel, 2010g NDA Panel, 2010f, 2010d, 2010a, 2012a, 2013b, 2013c, 2013d and endorsed opinions on DRVs for biotin and pantothenic acid for public consultation (EFSA NDA Panel, 2013g, 2013a.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applicant provided intake estimates based on protein intake data provided by the EFSA Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for protein (EFSA NDA Panel, 2012). In the EU, the average protein intakes of adults in absolute amounts range from approximately 67 to 114 g/day in men and from 59 to 102 g/day in women.…”
Section: Anticipated Intake/extent Of the Use Of The Nfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the data provided by the applicant, the levels of lysine and all other essential amino acids in rapeseed protein meet the amino acid scoring pattern recommended by the US Institute of Medicines (IOM, 2006). In addition, the applicant referred to FAO (1991) (WHO, 2007;EFSA, 2012). Using the most recent amino acid scoring pattern (EFSA NDA Panel, 2012) and a digestibility of 85 % from human studies, the PDCAAS of five batches of the NF has been calculated.…”
Section: Nutritional Information On the Nfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Panel's opinion on setting DRVs for protein (EFSA NDA Panel, 2012d) concluded that a PRI can be derived from nitrogen balance studies. For healthy adults of both sexes, the AR was established at 0.66 g protein/kg body weight per day based on nitrogen balance data.…”
Section: Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PD-CAAS is based on comparison of the concentration of the first limiting indispensable amino acid in the test protein (mg/g protein) with the concentration of that amino acid in a reference (scoring) pattern (mg/g protein). The ratio is corrected for the true faecal nitrogen digestibility, as measured in a rat assay (WHO/FAO/UNU, 2007;Schaafsma, 2012 The Panel considers that during energy restriction, protein intakes should not be below the PRI for adults (EFSA NDA Panel, 2012d). However, the PRI of 0.83 g/kg body weight per day cannot be directly applied to overweight or obese individuals considering that PRIs are derived for healthy, normal-weight individuals with corresponding body composition.…”
Section: Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%