2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Misinformation and Gender Affirming Care: Tools for Providers on the Front Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pediatric clinicians are particularly adept at handling misinformation and may encounter such concerns from guardians in the current political climate. It may be beneficial to review common themes of misinformation about medical treatments for GD and relay correct information [39 ▪ ]. An effective technique for handling misinformation is the ‘truth sandwich model’: state the truth, fact-check the falsehood, then repeat correct information [40].…”
Section: Sociopolitical Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pediatric clinicians are particularly adept at handling misinformation and may encounter such concerns from guardians in the current political climate. It may be beneficial to review common themes of misinformation about medical treatments for GD and relay correct information [39 ▪ ]. An effective technique for handling misinformation is the ‘truth sandwich model’: state the truth, fact-check the falsehood, then repeat correct information [40].…”
Section: Sociopolitical Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the balance of evidence favors GAC, arguments against these therapies are frequently based on inflammatory, misleading, and overtly false claims. A recent publication addressing scientific misinformation surrounding GAC addresses several of the most common claims alongside existing evidence [25 ▪ ]. In addition to recognizing and discounting the explicit falsehoods in many of these arguments, it is equally important for providers to acknowledge the actual safety profile of gender-affirming care via a candid and nuanced discussion of the existing evidence and unknowns.…”
Section: Opposition To Gender-affirming Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testimony has also been elicited from professionals who lack expertise in the field and have ties to discriminatory advocacy organizations. Some have inaccurately reported that gender affirming surgical procedures are performed on children and/or that TGD youth are being rushed into irreversible medical treatment they are likely to regret (see McNamara et al, 2022, for a summary and critique of this misinformation).…”
Section: Overview Of the Current Sociopolitical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true given the degree to which misinformation is actively circulating. Mental health providers will benefit from staying informed about the types of misinformation circulating and the clinical and research literature relevant to these areas (see McNamara et al, 2022).…”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%