2013
DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2013.781244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific geodata infrastructures: challenges, approaches and directions

Abstract: Based on various experiences in developing Geodata Infrastructures (GDIs) for scientific applications, this article proposes the concept of a Scientific GDI that can be used by scientists in environmental and earth sciences to share and disseminate their research results and related analysis methods. Scientific GDI is understood as an approach to tackle the science case in Digital Earth and to further enhance e-science for environmental research. Creating Scientific GDI to support the research community in eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at global scale, this form of assessment remains a challenge even for contemporary time periods (Vihervaara et al, 2013), with a variety of current efforts now attempting this using both experimental (Fraser et al, 2013) and observational approaches ( Jetz et al, 2012;Ellis, 2012) based on collaborative online geodata cyberinfrastructure (Bernard et al, 2013;Tallis et al, 2012). As noted by those engaging in these efforts, the first and foremost challenge is in gaining and sustaining adequate long-term support, though funding agencies, including the Earth Cube program of the US National Science Foundation now appear to be moving in this direction (Bernard et al, 2013). However, true progress will require more than a patchwork of demonstration projects and ad hoc tool development, but rather a long-term international investment in developing a common vision and infrastructure.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at global scale, this form of assessment remains a challenge even for contemporary time periods (Vihervaara et al, 2013), with a variety of current efforts now attempting this using both experimental (Fraser et al, 2013) and observational approaches ( Jetz et al, 2012;Ellis, 2012) based on collaborative online geodata cyberinfrastructure (Bernard et al, 2013;Tallis et al, 2012). As noted by those engaging in these efforts, the first and foremost challenge is in gaining and sustaining adequate long-term support, though funding agencies, including the Earth Cube program of the US National Science Foundation now appear to be moving in this direction (Bernard et al, 2013). However, true progress will require more than a patchwork of demonstration projects and ad hoc tool development, but rather a long-term international investment in developing a common vision and infrastructure.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a basic level, UAVs and the high-resolution aerial imagery they can gather are used to survey which structures (e.g., public buildings, hospitals, schools) may be available for shelter after a disaster. They are also used to monitor the distribution of goods, identify temporary settlements, and help to provide estimates of displaced persons and assessments of damage and search-and-rescue activities c) Infrastructure development (Bernard, Mäs, Müller, Henzen, & Brauner, 2013;Guo, Qingyun, Zhang, & Xu, 2008;Schall et al, 2009;Yang, Raskin, Goodchild, & Gahegan, 2010). LIDAR data's accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness support a wide variety of infrastructure development and management needs.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behind the scenes, approaches to support efficient and reliable online geoprocessing that alleviate the tension between the access to multiple and disparate spatial data sources and that support the coherent exploration of these data sources for knowledge discovery are more necessary than ever. Progress on online geoprocessing approaches is thus absolutely necessary, almost imperative, to turn Digital Earth's vision and objectives into tangible, usable 'tools' that for instance allow research teams to perform multi-disciplinary research or ease the ad hoc and timely generation of tailored information for citizens and in sum ensure the advancement of our body of knowledge (Bernard et al 2014). This special issue provides a state-of-the-art overview on recent developments and real-world applications of online geoprocessing in the view of the given objectives.…”
Section: Innovation In Geoprocessing For a Digital Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%