2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific design of a large-scale sodium thermal–hydraulic test facility for KALIMER—Part I: Scientific facility design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design parameters of the test facility were determined using an appropriate scaling method for similarity, and it has been described in the Part I paper (Hong et al, 2013). The present work validates the scaled reactor vessel design from the multi-dimensional temperature and flow distribution perspectives using three-dimensional CFD analyses for both the KALIMER-600 prototype and the one-fifth scale model.…”
Section: Scaling Evaluation Methods Using Cfdmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The design parameters of the test facility were determined using an appropriate scaling method for similarity, and it has been described in the Part I paper (Hong et al, 2013). The present work validates the scaled reactor vessel design from the multi-dimensional temperature and flow distribution perspectives using three-dimensional CFD analyses for both the KALIMER-600 prototype and the one-fifth scale model.…”
Section: Scaling Evaluation Methods Using Cfdmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, the present CFD analyses do not consider the temperature variations of the thermodynamic properties of sodium; instead, constant values were used. The variations of the sodium temperature based on the designed temperature of the hot and cold pools was approximately 150 K, and the thermodynamic properties varied by less than 10% in this level of temperature variation (Hong et al, 2013). The representative thermodynamic properties of sodium are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Analysis Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations