2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02215.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific consensus forum to review the evidence underpinning the recommendations of the Australian SIDS and Kids Safe Sleeping Health Promotion Programme – October 2010

Abstract: This paper summarises a 1-day scientific consensus forum that reviewed the evidence underpinning the Australian SIDS and Kids Safe Sleeping Health Promotion Programme. The focus was on each of the potentially modifiable risk factors for sudden unexpected deaths in infancy, including sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and fatal sleeping accidents. In particular infant sleeping position, covering of the face, exposure to cigarette smoke, room sharing, unsafe sleeping environments, bed sharing, immunisation, bre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, these researchers found that maternal concern about infant sleep duration was more prominent than their concern about SIDS. Families of both late preterm and term infants may benefit from greater awareness of the association of room sharing with reduced infant mortality from SIDS, particularly because covered infant airways and non-supine sleep position are more likely to occur in solitary infant sleep environments [34]. Better parental understanding of infant developmental processes can move the infant sleep conversation towards healthful nighttime family interactions and away from the desire to instill ‘independence’ in neonates that contributed to nighttime arrangements in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, these researchers found that maternal concern about infant sleep duration was more prominent than their concern about SIDS. Families of both late preterm and term infants may benefit from greater awareness of the association of room sharing with reduced infant mortality from SIDS, particularly because covered infant airways and non-supine sleep position are more likely to occur in solitary infant sleep environments [34]. Better parental understanding of infant developmental processes can move the infant sleep conversation towards healthful nighttime family interactions and away from the desire to instill ‘independence’ in neonates that contributed to nighttime arrangements in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while this practice makes sense to avoid covering an infant's head, and there was an increase in this practice seen in case-control studies during 1993-96 and 2003-06 particularly in non-SIDS infants, 50 there have been no studies to support that this is protective. 51 Recently, use of an infant sleeping bag has been recommended. A safe infant sleeping bag is one in which the infant cannot slip inside the bag and therefore the head cannot be covered.…”
Section: Head Covering and Beddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important papers such as the recently published one by Mitchell et al (2012) continue to present the risk factors of prone sleep position and bed-sharing in a way that infers respiratory compromise. Similarly, recent studies into these SIDS risk factors would appear to take the same "respiratory" approach to the problem (Baddock et al 2012).…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%